160 THE ORCHID REVIEW. [May, 1906. 
ORCHID PORTRAITS. 
BRASSOCATTLEYA X Mrs. FrRANcIS WELLESLEY.—-Gard. Mag., 1906, 
pp. 268, 269, with fig. ; 
CYPRIPEDIUM TIBETICUM, King.—Bot. Mag., t. 8070. 
DENDROBIUM DEVoNIANUM.—/Journ. Hort., 1906, 1. p. 317, with fig. 
DENDROBIUM NOBILE.—Gard. World, 313, 321, with fig. 
DENDROBIUM X WIGANIANUM, GATTON PARK VAR.—Gard. Chron., 1906, 
i. p. 219, fig. 85. 
DISA GRANDIFLORA.—Journ. Hort., 1906, 1. p. 339, with fig. 
L#LIO-CATTLEYA X HOPkKINSI.—Journ. Hort., 1906, i. p. 261, with fig. 
LZ#LIO-CATTLEYA X THE BaAron.—Gard. Mag., 1906, pp. 238, 239, 
with fig. 
LissocuiLus HorsFaLtu.—Garden, 1906, 1. p. 235, with fig. 
LycasTE SKINNERI.—Gard. World, 1906, p. 331, with fig. 
MACODES JAVANICA.—Gard. Chron., 1906, i. p. 216, with suppl. plate. 
ODONTOGLOSSUM X WILCKEANUM PittTi1a.—Gard. Mag., 1906, p. 224, 
with fig. F 
PHALZNOPSIS LUEDDEMANNIANA (propagated from old flower spikes).— 
Gard. Chron., 1906, i. p. 259, fig. 107. 
SOPHROCATTLEYA X WARNHAMENSIS VAR. CERISE.—Journ. Hort., 1906, 
1. p. 295, with fig. 
CORRESPONDENCE. 
(Correspondents not answered here may find replies to theiy queries on other pages, and in some 
cases, for various reasons, they may have to stand over for a future issue, In the case of hybrid 
_ Seedlings sent for name, the parentage and history should always be briefly stated, for without these 
details we are not always able to deal with them satisfactorily.) 
1, Eulophia gracilis, Lindl. 2, Miltonia Reichenheimii, Rolfe. 3, Catasetum 
trifidum, Hook. 4, Oncidium Batemanianum, Parment. 5, Oncidium maculatum, Lindl. 
G.B.L. Oncidium insculptum, Rchb.f. Several curious species occasionally flower out 
of importations of O. macranthum. 
E.A. Masdevallia triangularis. 
A.B. The Phaleenopsis leaf shows some mechanical injury, possibly through drip. 
No fungus is present. As only one plant out of twenty is affected moving the plant might 
be an effectual remedy. _ Glad to know the REVIEW is so helpful. 
H.A,, J.L., W.C.P., F.C., and several others, unavoidably held over till next issue. 
G.G. A prettily spotted form of O. crispum, which should be good when established. 
me We have not been able to make out the microscopic spider found on your 
Phalznopsis. Should the mischief continue please forward actual specimens. The drawing 
of it —_ the red spider, though clearly showing the marked differences between the two is 
not sufficient to enable us to determine the insect. 
Photographs received, with thanks, De B. c. 
