174 Catalogue of Mammalia inhabiting [No. 171. 



Simia leucisca, apud Fisher. 



Hylobates leuciscus, apud Ogilby. 



Hylobates leuciscus, apud Schinz.* 

 Hab. — Borneo, ? 



Java. 



Gen. — Semnopithecus, F. Cuv. 

 Semnopithecus obscurus, Reid. 

 Syn. — Simia maura ? Lin. Lotong, apud Raffles.f 



Semnopithecus leucomystax, Temm. in MSS. 



Semnopithecus obscurus, apud Martin. 



Presbytes obscura, Gray, List of Mamm. B. M. 



Semnopithecus sumatranus, Miiller, apud Schinz. J 



Semnopithecus halonifer, Cantor, Proceed. Linn. Soc. 



" L6tong" or " Lotong etam," of the Malays of the Peninsula. 

 Hab. — Malayan Peninsula, Pinang, Singapore. 



District adjacent to Singapore, in the Malayan Peninsula. 

 Semnopithecus albocinereus, Schinz. 

 Syn. — Cercopithecus albocinereus, Desmarest. 



Simia albocinerea, Fisher. 



Semnopithecus dorsatus, (young) Waterhouse MSS.§ apud 



Presbytes cinerea, Gray, List. [Martin. 



Semnopithecus albimanus, Is. Geoff. ? 



" Ka-ka" of the Malays of the Peninsula. 

 Hab. — Malayan Peninsula. 



* Among the Syn. occurs Ungka putt, Raffles, which is Hylobates agilis. 



f The Hab. Pinang and Singapore, in neither of which islands Semnopithecus fe- 

 moralis appears to occur, tends to prove, that Sir S. Raffles did not, as it has been sup- 

 posed, refer to that species. His short description indicates 5. obscurus (Lotong,) the 

 most common species in both islands. Sir S. Raffles evidently did not describe the 

 living animal, or he would not have omitted one of the most striking characters, viz. 

 the white marks of the face, which, in preserved specimens, become obliterated, so that 

 the face appears uniformly black. The omission of this character by Sir S. Raffles, 

 and subsequently by later describers of this species, has given rise to confusion. 



X Schinz repeats S. femoralis, Martin, as a Syn. for 5. sumatranus, and says in a 

 note, that Miiller in his monograph of Semnopithecus refers that species to his S. 

 sumatranus (Schinz Syn. Mam. I. p. 39, note.) Were even the two identical, the 

 species should not have been renamed, as S. femoralis, Horsfield, not Martin, would 

 take precedence, being the denomination under which Dr. Horsfield described it in 

 the Appendix to the Life of Sir T. Stamford Raffles, 1830. 



§ Martin, p. 481, refers the young S. dorsatus to S. femoralis, but the description 

 is that of the young of the present species. 



