Series in Kansas, Oklahoma and New Mexico. 215 
Cardium belvederi Cragin, 3. Dentalium, 4. 
(Not described.) Trochus texanus Roemer, 6. 
Cardium hillanum Sow. ? 4. Margarita marcouana Cragin, 6. 
‘“¢  kansaense, 3. “© (Solariella) Newberryi 
(?) “  mudgeii Cragin. Cragin, 6. 
“¢ — (Nemocardium) biso- Neritina sp., 4. 
laris Cragin, 6. Serpula iintrica White, 2. 
Cyprina ovata M. & H., 2,3. Vanikoro propinqua Cragin, 7. 
Tapes belviderensis Cragin, 6. Scalaria sp. (?) 4. 
Roudaria quadrans Cragin, 4. Turritella marnochii White 
Cyprimeria crassa Meek, 2, 4. (probably T. seriatim granu- 
a gradata Cragin, 3. lata Roemer), 2. 
(Not described.) - Turritella marnochii White 
Leptosolen belvederi Cragin, 4. “typical” Cragin, 4. 
(Not described.) Turritella marnochii White, var. 
Leptosolen otterensis Cragin, 6. _belvideri Cragin, 4. 
Pholadomya? elegans? 4. Anchura kiowana Cragin, 7. 
4 sancta sabe Globiconcha elevata Shum., 4. 
Roemer, 4. Neritoma marcouana Cragin, 7. 
Homomya alta Roemer, 4. Ammonites acutocarinatus 
Liopistha protexta Con., 4. Shum., 3, 4. 
Mactra antiqua Cragin, 6. A. pedernalis Roemer, 4. 
Corbula crassicostata Cragin, 7. Petersia Medicinensis Cragin, 6. 
The large and abundant collections of invertebrate fossils, 
made by Mr. C. N. Gould and the writer from the shale beds 
overlying the sandstone from which these fossil plants were 
collected and grading into them, were determined by Mr. T. 
W. Stanton, Paleontologist of the U. S. Geological Survey, who 
reports upon them as follows: 
Washington, Jan. 25, 1895. 
Mr. R. T. Hitz, U. 8. Geological Survey. 
Dear Sir.—I have the honor to submit the following report 
on the fossils collected by you last season in southern Kansas. 
The collection includes fossils from three different localities, 
which, according to the labels, are Black Hill, Blue Cut Mound, 
and hill four miles west of Sun City, Kansas, all of which are 
in Comanche and Barber counties. The collections from the first 
two localities are from several different horizons, but as they all 
evidently belong to one fauna they have all been combined in 
one annotated list, though the separate lists for each locality and 
layer are also appended in order that the record may be complete. 
In connection with the examination I have made a preliminary 
study of your Washita collection from the Denison section for 
comparison. 
