L. F. Ward — Fossil Cycads in the Yale Museum. 333 



Cycadeoidea nana, No. 84. 



Cycadeoidea occidentalis, No. 234. 



Cycadeoidea Paynei, Nos. 52?, 58?, 69?. 132, 135, 163?, 165, 

 188?, 24V?, 263?, 272, 280?, 284?, 293??, 316, 319??, 334, 336?, 

 337 ?, 364, 376, 386, 395 ?, 399, 413 ?, 423 ?, 428 ?, 434 ?, 447, 448, 

 451?, 452, 493 ?, 712, 713. 



Cycadeoidea protea, Nos. 32, 185, 187, 241, 253, 296, 297, 303, 

 315, 359, 382, 414, 457, 458, 463, 466, 487, 499, 521, 529. 



Cycadeoidea pulcherrima, Nos. 78, 159, 545. 



Cycadeoidea reticulata, Nos. 254, 282, 287, 335, 342, 377, 378. 



Cycadeoidea rhombica, Nos. 620, 623, 627, 629, 630, 631, 640. 



Cycadeoidea Stillwelli, Nos. 16, 36, 56?, 105, 107?, 119, 175?, 

 226 ?, 515 ??, 517 ?, 552 ?, 651 ??, 662 ?? 



Cycadeoidea superba, Nos. 137, 146, 147, 218, 717. 



Cycadeoidea turrita, Nos. 15, 35 ?, 45, 49, 51, 65, 66-, 67, 74, 75, 

 82, 85, 139, 141, 151 ?, 166, 183, 190 ?, 191 ?, 223 ?, 255 ??, 261 ?, 

 269, 270?, 278, 295??, 304?, 313, 323, 330, 352 ?, 360, 368, 374, 

 394, 402, 406, 408?, 409, 446?, 450 ?, 482, 483, 484, 486, 519??, 

 731. 



Cycadeoidea utopiensis, No. 727. 



Cycadeoidea Wellsii, Nos. 21, 59, 130, 136, 138, 222,243, 322, 

 '391, 400, 500, 501, 537. 



Cycadeoidea Wielandi, Nos. 77, 131, 393, 424. 



Indeterminable, Nos. 31, 170, 172, 177, 178, 209, 237, 251, 260, 

 274, 275, 294, 302, 306, 308, 311, 312, 317,341,345,347,363, 

 371, 385, 389, 390, 416, 417, 419, 421, 427, 441, 442, 443, 454,459, 

 460, 464,465,470, 475, 477, 485, 488, 514, 524, 527,531, 604, 635, 

 637, 664, 679, 687, 704, 707, 709, 715. 



The specimens marked as "indeterminable" are largely 

 fragments, i. e., small pieces broken away from the trunks to 

 which they belonged, and it is to be hoped that an exhaustive 

 comparison with all the specimens in the collection may result 

 in the restoration of a considerable number to the trunks now 

 in the collection. As an aid in this work I have indicated in 

 many cases the species to which they are most likely to belong, 

 and given other hints as to where to look with the greatest 

 prospect of success. 



Considerable search has already been made to bring such 

 fragments together, and it has been successful in about twenty 

 cases. As a natural result this has changed a few of the 

 assignments previously made and published ; thus, No. 9, 

 doubtfully referred to C. colossalis, proves to be a part of the 

 trunk, No. 33, of C. Marshiana ; No.. 13, referred to O. daco- 

 tensis, belongs to Nos. 17 and 40, constituting a fine trunk of 

 C. colossalis / No. 47, thought perhaps to be a branch of C. 

 Marshiana, fits No. 142, and both together make up a good 

 specimen of C. minnekahtensis / and No. 70, which resembles 



