404 Review of" A Lecture on the Sdnkhya Philosophy" [No. 5. 



date. It is not referred to in the Karika or in Gaudapada's commen- 

 tary. It is noticed, indeed, in Vijnanacharya's Bhashya in the manner 

 above stated ; but this work is much later than Gaudapada. Who 

 is the author of its (the Sankhya Tattwa Samasa) commentary, bear- 

 ing the title " Tattwasamasasutravritti, we do not learn from the com- 

 mentary itself, as the author has not named himself at the end of it, as is 

 usually the case. There is, however, an interesting notice on the Tattwa- 

 samasasutras and its Vritti in a commentary of the Karika, entitled 

 " Sankhyatattwavilasa," by Raghunatha Tarkavagis'a Bhattacharya,* 

 where at its commencement the traditional belief is given as to the 

 origin of this collection of Sutras, and of the author of the commentary 

 of them, together with the Sutras themselves, and a short explanation 

 of them. We think this tradition very curious, and do therefore not 

 hesitate to transcribe the whole passage relating to the traditional 

 account of the school. f 



* This work was not known to Colebrooke ; at least it is not mentioned by him 

 in his essay. A MS. of it is in the Library of the Asiatic Society. 



t tjtt far<*r ^rfirafips ^rof^rraT ^^n^n ^rsnf^Tfwfa-- 



?inf^f^TfiJff^fafa^l§":^T«r**P ^T^WnrT4' ^fa^^f* ^Tpj^cqT- 



<3t^t ^Twrsrpsrfw^r? i wi^r ^rfrr^rW* f^fftrs *rroT«rsi far w*rc 

 sktsf^: *?nfaf?r II fT<f- 3>fa*r ^rr^r i ^^rfa 1 1 wswirv i ^ ^r»t 

 fw^T: i \ ^w i a %m i i *w i ^ ^fa*^ i ^ <*pwm i 



c ^ffawrf I £ ^rf*K^T3 I \° Tf W%*T> I U ^ ^ST^: I ^ tt^ 

 ?!*&'• I ^ ?[^ W*mn*ti I \U V"% ^^Tf^^JT I U ^2TfV?rf?P*T$S- 

 ¥ttw : I *«C *r^T gf«: I ^ ^S^T Ml-* I \* ^?W ^f^iWmV* I l£ ^R- 



i?Wi: i \° ^j^f^vr wrrzh i ^ feUm sTTrpjih i ^ M^t *wi 

 ^ M^t 5t^: i va f^rftii wrci i ^n f%f%^ ^:# i Kftmx ^reicntf i 



