EBBATA IN THE JOUBNAL FOR 1858. 

 VOL. XXVII. 



Page 230, notes, last line for adjective read adjection. 



„ 235, notes 1. 3 ab infra read ^f^T*T. 



„ 240, notes, 1. 15 for and read are. 



„ 248, notes, 1. 6 for 3?r^ read ^JT^. 



„ 249, notes, 1. 2 for Gautama read Gotama. 



„ „ notes, 1. 4<for Ras read Rao. 



3 , 302, 1. 14 for occidental read accidental. 



„ 303, 1. 23 read ^f^fqTej; and ^^oJTW. 



„ 305, 1. 20 for which read while. 



„ 313, 1. Ifor o*ib /*U3( ^b read ^ib cJb *L3| 



The conclusion of Mr. Hodgson's paper, given in this Vol. having been sent 

 to England for his revision, we are enabled to publish his corrections. 



The Editors are glad to find that in this part (the MS. having been legible 

 throughout) there are hardly any errors of importance. 



We give the following extract from Mr. Hodgson's letter. 



" The errata amount to little more than a perseverance in that titular misnomer 

 whereby comparative vocabularies of the empirical kind were confounded with gram- 

 matical treatises. Papers one and two, on the languages of the broken tribes and on 

 the dialectic differences of the language of the Kiranti tribe, were of the former sort. 

 Papers three and four on the Vayu and Bailing, were of the latter sort, and should 

 therefore have been kept apart, as well from each other as from the preceding 

 papers, even though you had determined to throw the descriptive part of Vayu 

 and Bahing to the end of the papers on them. Whereas you have run the whole 

 of the four papers into one, under the style and title of " Comparative Voca- 

 bulary of the languages of the broken tribes of Nepal," a designation which is 

 true only in regard to the first of these four papers ; for the Kirantis are not 

 one of the broken tribes ; nor is there the least affinity between the empirical 

 treatment of the vocabularies of both one and the other and the grammatical 

 analyses which follow, though of the samples of language chosen for this analysis, 

 one belonged to a tribe classed with the broken, and the other to a tribe classed 

 among the septs or clans of the Kirantis. 



Therefore I have erased the heading of the part now returned to you (Com- 

 parative Vocabulary, &c.) and substituted "grammatical analysis of the Bahing 



