502 Notices of New Works. [No. 5., 



many words at present appear in them which can hardly be recon- 

 ciled with such an early date. Dr. Aufrccht mentions two, ' dinar a' 

 (3. 140) and ' mihird? (1. 52), which are evidently connected with 

 the Latin Denarius and the Persian mihr. But in the first of these 

 instances Ujjwaladatta most satisfactorily explains the anomaly. In 

 the Sutras as given in the Siddhanta Kaumudi, we read ^t^T W& 

 ^ II CfaTT: fPWTO? II hut in Ujjwaladatta's earlier recension 

 we have the following valuable addition ^t^T ?re ^ || ^t^ ^3 ! 



^¥tjT ^ «T ~^M^ II " after the root « ding* in the sense of ' de- 

 struction,' the suffix aran is employed with the augment n (nut), as 

 dvndra, ' a golden ornament.' This Sutra is not found in the Deva 

 and Suti commentaries ." The same remark is made in several other 

 places. 



In the editions hitherto printed, * besides many other faults, su- 

 tras were often given as commentary,* and the commentary turned 

 into siitras' (Pref. p. xx.) ; these faults are here all corrected, and 

 we have now an edition of this very valuable part of ancient Indian 

 Grammar which criticism may safely depend upon. At the end, 

 the editor adds a very useful philological Glossary, and a list of the 

 principal Unadi suffixes which actually occur in Sanskrit. From 

 the latter we extract the following, — the Sanskrit accent being 

 marked by the Italic letter; " u, — the oldest suffix of the Indo-Ger- 

 manic languages. Ex. a'su wkv, urw Ivpv, gum fiapv, tan^ ravv, pas'tj 

 pecu, purw 7ro\v, prithw ttXcltv, bahu iroyy, baliM Trrjx * m«dhu [JLedv, 

 Compare in Latin genu, veru, curru, &c." 



]? ants chat antrum sive quinquepartiium de moribus exponens, ex Codd. 

 MSS. edidit J. G. L. Kosegahten. Pars II 1859. 



Professor Kosegarten has here given, as a sequel to the first part 

 published several years ago, a more ornate version of the stories of 

 the Panchatantra. Beside the occasional purpurei panni of rheto- 

 rical description which are inserted here and there, we also find 

 several variations in the stories themselves, and many of them ap- 



* Thus in Bohtlingk's ed, p. 15, we have in 1, 129, a new sutra drindteli shug~ 

 ghraswas cha disguised as part of the comin. 



