1853.] On the Mongolian Affinities of the Caucasians. 



37 



Sa in Malay. ■{ 



Su-m in Vagu. 



I. — Ma in Osetic. 



Ma in Mingrelian. 

 Ma in Lazic. 

 Mi in Suanic. 

 Ma in Tinnic. 



Mo-n in Sap. 



Mi in Mongol. 

 Mi in Mantchu. 



rMeans one. Smidt wittily remarks 

 on the perpetual coincidence of 

 the first personal pronoun, and 

 the first numeral, which is also 

 constantly equivalent to the inde- 

 finite article, where wanting. 



In composition only, as Ha-sum, 

 give to me. 



{ 



I. — Je-s in Armenian. 

 Ji in JNewari. 

 v Ja in Horpa. 



Z — A-z, A-s in Osetic. 

 An-ka in Kiranti. 

 A-ku, X in Malay. 

 X in Manyak. j 



Ka in Dhimali. (^ 



Thou. — She-n in Georgian. 

 Si in Mingrelian. 

 Si in Suanic. 

 T'shi in Mongol. 

 Se-n in Turki. 

 Sa-n in Onigur. 

 Sa in Finnic. 

 Chha in Newari. 

 Cha in Sokpa. 



Su in Tai. 



f Compare Mo-i, man, in Osetic and 



< M6n the Indo-Chinese tribe 

 (^ name. 



/'Deduced from the derivatives Mi- 

 \ ni and Mi-ning-ge. So Mi in the 

 1 sense of man is deduced from 

 V. Mim-ma and Sa-mi in Burmese. 



f See remarks, voce Dog, on the voca- 



< lie changes to which all roots 

 ( nearly are subject. 



X is the root throughout Za, Sa, 

 Ka, Ku, being serviles, though 

 some of them, as Ka, frequently 



take the place of the root. 



Si, Shi ; Se, She ; Sa, sha, Su, are 

 the several phases of the root, or 

 cycle of customary variation, just 

 as in the nouns. See remarks 

 on ' Kha' voce Dog. 



The plural, Ye. 



He. — Na in Armenian. 

 JNa in Chinese. 

 Na in Malay. 

 M in Khyeng. 

 No in Anam. 

 Ha-na-i 1 . Tr 

 h'na-i jmKami. 



Ha prefix and I suffix, servile. 



