410 RECAPITULATION. [Chap. XV. 



changed slowly and in a graduated manner. We clearly see this 

 in the fossil remains from consecutive formations invariably being 

 much more closely related to each other, than are the fossils from 

 widely separated formations. 



Such is the sum of the several chief objections and difficulties 

 which may be justly urged against the theory ; and I have now 

 briefly recapitulated the answers and explanations which, as far 

 as I can see, may be given. I have felt these difficulties far too 

 heavily during many years to doubt their weight. But it deserves 

 especial notice that the more important objections relate to ques- 

 tions on which we are confessedly ignorant ; nor do we know how 

 ignorant we are. We do not know all the possible transitional 

 gradations between the simplest and the most perfect organs; it 

 cannot be pretended that we know all the varied means of Distribu- 

 tion during the long lapse of years, or that we know how imperfect 

 is the Geological Record. Serious as these several objections are, 

 m my judgment they are by no means sufficient to overthrow the 

 theory of descent with subsequent modification. 



Xow let us' turn to the other side of the argument. Under 

 domestication we see much variability, caused, or at least excited, 

 by changed conditions of life ; but often in so obscure a manner, 

 that we are tempted to consider the variations as spontaneous. 

 Variability is governed by many complex laws, — by correlated 

 growth, compensation, the increased use and disuse of parts, and 

 1 he definite action of the surrounding conditions. There is much 

 difficulty in ascertaining how largely our domestic productions 

 have been modified ; but we may safely infer that the amount 

 has been large, and that modifications can be inherited for long 

 periods. As long as the conditions of life remain the same, we 

 have reason to believe that a modification, which has already been 

 inherited for many generations, may continue to be inherited for an 

 almost infinite number of generations. On the other hand, we have 

 evidence that variability when it has once come into play, does not 

 cease under domestication for a very long period ; nor do we know 

 that it ever ceases, for new varieties are still occasionally produced 

 by our oldest domesticated productions. 



Variability is not actually caused by man; he only uninten- 

 tionally exposes organic beings to new conditions of life, and then 

 nature acts on the organisation and causa? * + to vary. But man 

 can and does select the variations given to him by nature, <md tnus 

 iccumidates them in any desired manner. He thus adapts animals 

 and plants for his own benefit or pleasure. He may do this 



