STUDIES ON INDO-AUSTRALIAN LEPIDOPTERA II. 79 



Yet we hâve doubtless to do hère with another species, because the maie copulatory appa- 

 ratus is totally différent and resembles more that of N. nora Feld. 



I hope to be so fortunate as to study the species of the genus Nacaduba more minu- 

 tely than is possible to me just now. 



Gen. Eupsychellus. 



143. E. dionisius Boisd. — 7 çfçf and 1 9 Kloofbivak 1, 3, 5, 7 Mardi 1913. 2 çf çf 

 Coll. Baggelaar. The spécimens from Kloofbivak are larger than those from N.W. New Guinea. 



Gen. Amblypodia Horsf. 



144. A. aexone Hew. — 2 çfçf and 2 99 Coll. Baggelaar, 



145. A. hercules Hew. — 1 çf Kloofbivak 7 March 191 3. 1 9 Beaufort River 6 

 Dec. 1912. 



146. A. micale Blanch. — 1 9 Kloofbivak 7 March 191 3. 



147. A. narada Horsf. — 1 Ç Coll. Baggelaar. This spécimen is on the underside very 

 dark brown, nearly without the characteristic pattern. 



Gen. Curetis Hubn. 

 146. C. tlietis Drur. — 3 ç?C? Bivakeiland 28 Febr., Kloofbivak 3 and 5 March 1913. 



As a resuit of this faunistic study, I must call attention to the lepidopterological fauna 

 of that part of the explored territory which extends from Sabang to the mountains and in 

 which are situated the localities Alkmaar, Kloofbivak and Beaufort River. It is also reasonable 

 that we should hâve observed différent forms in that part, because we can see, by studying 

 the map which was published in Bulletin N°. 64 of the „Maatschappij ter bevordering van het 

 Xatuurkundig Onderzoek der Nederlandsche Koloniën," that near Sabang are beginning the 

 hills which are regularly passing into the mountains. Yet the low lands of the Southern 

 explored part of Dutch New Guinea hâve also given several interesting transitional forms 

 from those of the Western and North-Western parts to the Eastern one. The above named 

 facts hâve not been noticed by Mr. RÔBER, because, as is clear, he has received material 

 from other parts of the gigantic island, which possesses a continental le pidoptera-fauna and 

 which fauna is locally différent. Mr. FRUHSTORFER already mentioned this fact many years ago. 



Lastly I would advise to compare the two lists (Mr. RôBER's and mine) to get an 

 impression of the riches of the lepidopterological fauna of the territories explored by the 

 Dutch Expéditions. It is not necessary for me to name the species which Mr. RôBER has 

 received and I hâve not. 



In conclusion I hâve to thank Prof. Dr. J. C. H. DE ME1JERE for sending me the 

 above-mentioned collections, and thus enabling me to describe them, which labour has afforded 

 me much pleasure. 



Leiden, 7 Nov. 1914. 



