i'A?~:>~:.s:: _■_: :l::.: to man 



The Interpretation of the Facts. 



The facts now set forth prove the existence of a number 

 of mental faculties which either do not exist at all or exist 

 in a very rudimentary condition in savages, but appear 

 almost suddenly and in perfect development in the higher 

 civilised races. These same faculties are further distinguished 

 by their sporadic character, being well developed only in a 

 very small proportion of the community ; and by the enormous 

 amount of variation in their development, the higher mani- 

 festations of them being many times — perhaps a hundred or 

 a thousand times — stronger than the lower. Each of these 

 characteristics is totally inconsistent with any action of the 

 law of natural selection in the production of the faculties 

 referred to: and the facts, taken in their entirety, compel 

 us to recognise some origin for them wholly distinct from that 

 which has served to account for the animal characteristics — 

 whether bodily or mental — of man. 



under the law of natural selection. He says : " It may be objected that, in 

 man, in addition to the instincts inherent in every individual, special indi- 

 vidual predispositions are also found, of such a nature that it is impossible 

 they can have arisen by individual variations of the germ-plasm. On the 

 other hand, these predispositions — which we call talents — cannot have arisen 

 through natural selection, because life is in no way dependent on their presence, 

 and there seems to be no way of explaining their origin except by an assump- 

 tion of the summaii 

 single life. In this 

 accept the transmis 



tainftd by exercise in the course of each 

 m at first sight to be compelled to 

 iers." Weismann then goes on to 



" : :;::.: :"_t ~. :.:"_. 7 :_ :■":::•.'-. r_v.?::;.~. 

 r in a family whose other members 

 d ; and that even when hereditary 

 maximum at the commencement or 

 g to the end, as it should do if it 

 f acquired skill. Gauss was not the 

 .-.::■ l. n:: li'.L:.- :: :. v :.-'.-.'. :.-'. 

 .-■_- -:::- :: :Lrse i_t-_ :: ; >„: v ; 

 rrr-ri_i^er.:e ir. :7e:r restrirlve 



show that the facts do not support this vie^ 

 :r i:rl-7i: ::.:v-l:ir> :::ri. : r : ^uilr^lv 

 and ancestors were in no way distinguished 

 in families, the talent often appears at its n 

 in the middle of the series, not increasing 

 depended in any way on the transmission of 

 son of a mathematician, nor Handel of a mi 

 there is no proof of any special talent in th< 

 who at once developed the most marvellou 

 talents. And after showing that such great 

 of human development, and that two or m 

 unfrequently combined in one individual, he concludes thus — 



'•V'_ : ... :'..- =:-." r:: I ::.';- -;-._ :: : '.'. :..-.. :_ 117 ...._. ...It-.? i: -.'. 

 :.rvr:.r :: I-rVr^I ■:'_ : '..-. ;::._— t:v.tm: ::' i-7 -jf:i.\l Lri:\ ::\:v "7 

 continued practice ; but they ire the expression, and to a certain extent the 

 bye -product, of the human mind, which is so highly developed in all 

 directions." 



It will, I think, be admitted that this view hardly accounts for the 

 existence of the highly peculiar human faculties in question. 



:::-. r.:: 



