THE TRIASSIC PERIOD. 21 5 



with teeth precisely similar to those of its Triassic predecessor ; 

 and we thus have become acquainted with the use of these 



Fig. 147. — Ceratodns Fostci'i, the Australian Mud-fish, reduced in size. 



structures and the manner in which they were implanted in 

 the mouth. The palate carries two of these plates, with their 

 longer straight sides turned towards each other, their sharply- 

 sinuated sides turned outwards, and their short straight sides 

 or bases directed backwards. Two similar plates in the lower 

 jaw correspond to the upper, their undulated surfaces fitting 

 exactly to those of the opposite teeth. There are also two 

 sharp-edged front teeth, which are placed in the front of the 

 mouth in the upper jaw; but these have not been recognised 

 in the fossil specimens. The living Ceratodns feeds on vege- 

 table matters, which are taken up or torn off from plants by 

 the sharp front teeth, and then partially crushed between the 

 undulated surfaces of the back' teeth (Giinther) ; and there 

 need be little doiibt but that the Triassic Ceratodi followed 

 a similar mode of existence. From the study of the. living 

 Ceratodns, it is certain that the genus belongs to the same 

 group as the existing Mud-fishes {^Dipnoi) ; and we therefore 

 learn that this, the highest, group of the entire class of Fishes 

 existed in Triassic times under forms little or not at all differ- 

 ent from species now alive; whilst it has become probable 

 that the order can be traced back into the Devonian period. 



The Amphibia7is of the Trias all belong to the old order of 

 the Labyrinthodonts, and some of them are remarkable for 

 their gigantic dimensions. They were first known by their 

 footprints, which were found to occur plentifully in the Tri- 

 assic sandstones of Britain and the continent of Europe, and 

 which consisted of a double series of alternately-placed pairs 

 of hand-shaped impressions, the hinder print of each pair being 

 much larger than the one in front (fig. 148). So like were these 

 impressions to the shape-of the human hand, that the at that 

 time unknown animal which produced them was at once chris- 

 tened Cheirotherium^ or " Hand-beast." Further discoveries, 

 however, soon showed that the footprints of Cheirotheriuni 

 were really produced by species of Amphibians which, like the 

 existing Frogs, possessed hind-feet of a much larger size than 



