148 



DINOSAUEIA. 



row of nine dental alveoli on the outer border, internally 

 to which, there are seen near the anterior part the crowns 

 of two replacing teeth in alveolo. The first and best pre- 

 served of these teeth agrees exactly with No. E. 964. 

 The maxilla is depressed, like that of a Crocodile, and 

 shows three large foramina on the outer surface. It 

 apparently agrees very closely with the minute outline of 

 the maxilla of Brontosaurus given by Marsh in the ' Amer. 

 Journ.' ser. 3, vol. xxvi. pi. i. 



Fox Collection. Purchased, 1882. 



R. 87. An imperfect cervical vertebra; from the Isle of Wight. 



'(Fig.) Figured by Hulke in the ' Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc' 



vol. xxxvi. pi. iii. fig. 1. Fox Collection. 



R. 87 a. An imperfect cervical vertebra, with the right rib attached ; 



(Fig.) from the Isle of Wight. Figured by Hulke, op. c%t. pi. iii. 



figs. 3, 4. Same history. 



R. 173. Two imperfect cervical vertebrae ; from the Isle of Wight. 



Same history. 



R. 93. Three more or less imperfect centra of cervical vertebrae ; from 

 the Isle of Wight. Same history. 



R. 94. Portions of vertebral processes from the thoracic region; 

 from the Isle of Wight. Same history. 



46869. The somewhat imperfect centrum of a cervical vertebra, 



(Fig.) provisionally referred to this form ; from the Isle of 



Wight. Figured by Owen in his ' Wealden and Purbeck 



Eeptilia ' (Mon. Pal. Soc), suppl. vii. pis. ii. & iii., as 



Chondrosteosaurus gigas, of which it is one of the types. 



Purchased, 1875. 



28632. An imperfect anterior dorsal vertebra ; from the Isle of 

 (Fig.) Wight. The type specimen. Noticed by Seeley in his 

 ' Ornithosauria,' p. 103, note, and described by him in the 

 'Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist.' ser. 4, vol. v. p. 280 ; figured by 

 Owen in his ' Mesozoic Eeptilia ' (Mon. Pal. Soc), pt. ii. 

 pi. viii., as the type of Bothriosjpondylus magnus ; and 

 noticed by Hulke in the ' Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc' vol. 

 xxxv. pp. 754, 755, and vol. xxxviii. p. 357. The latter 

 writer, in the former passage (p. 755), distinctly states 

 that this specimen must be taken as the type of the genus 

 (and therefore of the species) ; but in the second passage 

 he makes the specimen No. 2239, noticed on p. 142, 

 the type, and refers the present specimen to 0. eucame- 



