﻿76 
  ACTINOPTERYGII. 
  

  

  The 
  following 
  species 
  have 
  also 
  been 
  determined 
  upon 
  fragmentary 
  

   evidence, 
  but 
  there 
  are 
  no 
  examples 
  in 
  the 
  Collection 
  : 
  — 
  

  

  Golobodus 
  bronni 
  : 
  Asterodon 
  bronnii, 
  G. 
  von 
  Miinster, 
  Beitr. 
  

   Petrefakt. 
  pt. 
  iv. 
  (1841), 
  p. 
  140, 
  pi. 
  xvi. 
  fig. 
  14 
  ; 
  W. 
  Dames, 
  

   Pateont. 
  Abhandl. 
  vol. 
  iv. 
  (1888), 
  p. 
  153: 
  Golobodus 
  

   varius, 
  C. 
  G. 
  Giebel, 
  Neues 
  Jahrb. 
  1848, 
  p. 
  152 
  {err 
  ore). 
  — 
  

   St. 
  Cassian 
  Beds 
  ; 
  Tyrol. 
  [Fragment 
  of 
  dentition 
  ; 
  Palae- 
  

   ontological 
  Museum, 
  Munich.] 
  The 
  so-called 
  Gyrolepis 
  

   biplicatus 
  (Miinster, 
  op. 
  cit. 
  p. 
  140, 
  pi. 
  xvi. 
  fig. 
  15) 
  may 
  

   perhaps 
  be 
  the 
  scale 
  of 
  this 
  species. 
  

  

  Golobodus 
  scutatus, 
  P. 
  Gervais, 
  Zool. 
  et 
  Pal. 
  Franc,. 
  (1852), 
  Poiss., 
  

   Explic. 
  Planches, 
  p. 
  13, 
  pi. 
  lxxvii. 
  fig. 
  16 
  ; 
  «W. 
  Dames, 
  

   Palaeont. 
  Abhandl. 
  vol. 
  iv. 
  (1888), 
  p. 
  166.— 
  Muschelkalk 
  ; 
  

   Moselle, 
  France. 
  

  

  Golobodus 
  sibiricus, 
  A. 
  S. 
  Woodward, 
  Ann. 
  Mag. 
  Nat. 
  Hist. 
  [6] 
  

   vol. 
  iv. 
  (1889), 
  p. 
  107 
  : 
  Palceoniscus 
  sibiricus, 
  J. 
  Y. 
  Rohon, 
  

   Mem. 
  .Acad. 
  Imp. 
  Sci. 
  St.-Petersbourg, 
  [7] 
  vol. 
  xxxvi. 
  

   no. 
  13 
  (1889), 
  p. 
  12, 
  pi. 
  ii. 
  figs. 
  21, 
  22, 
  28.— 
  Triassic 
  (?) 
  ; 
  

   Kubekowa, 
  Upper 
  Jenissei, 
  Siberia. 
  [Scales 
  ; 
  Imperial 
  

   Academy 
  of 
  Sciences, 
  St. 
  Petersburg.] 
  

  

  The 
  fossils 
  described 
  under 
  the 
  following 
  names 
  may 
  be 
  fragments 
  

   of 
  the 
  dentary 
  bone 
  of 
  Golobodus, 
  but 
  they 
  are 
  as 
  yet 
  indetermin- 
  

   able 
  : 
  — 
  

  

  Gharitodon 
  glabridens, 
  E. 
  E. 
  Schmid, 
  Nova 
  Acta 
  Acad. 
  Cses. 
  Leop.- 
  

   Car. 
  vol. 
  xxix. 
  no. 
  9 
  (1861), 
  p. 
  30, 
  pi. 
  i. 
  fig. 
  41.— 
  

   Muschelkalk 
  ; 
  Jena. 
  

  

  Gharitodon 
  granulosus, 
  E. 
  E. 
  Schmid, 
  ibid. 
  p. 
  30, 
  pi. 
  i. 
  fig. 
  42. 
  — 
  

   Ibid. 
  

  

  Gharitodon 
  procerus, 
  H. 
  Eck, 
  Form. 
  bunt. 
  Sandst. 
  u. 
  Muschelk. 
  

   Oberschlesien 
  (1865), 
  p. 
  70, 
  pi. 
  ii. 
  fig. 
  4. 
  — 
  Lower 
  Mus- 
  

   chelkalk 
  ; 
  (?) 
  Chorzow. 
  

  

  Gharitodon 
  tschudii, 
  H. 
  von 
  Meyer, 
  Palaeontogr. 
  vol. 
  i. 
  (1849), 
  

   p. 
  205, 
  pi. 
  xxxi. 
  figs. 
  22, 
  23 
  : 
  Gharitosaurus 
  tschudii, 
  H. 
  

   von 
  Meyer, 
  Neues 
  Jahrb. 
  1838, 
  p. 
  415. 
  Figures 
  also 
  by 
  

   Buttner, 
  Rudera 
  diluvii 
  testes 
  (1710), 
  pi. 
  x. 
  fig. 
  6, 
  and 
  

   Knorr 
  & 
  Walch, 
  Yerstein. 
  Suppl. 
  pi. 
  viii. 
  fig. 
  2. 
  — 
  Muschel- 
  

   kalk 
  ; 
  Querfurt 
  and 
  Esperstadt, 
  Saxony. 
  

  

  Hemilojpas 
  mentzeli, 
  H. 
  von 
  Meyer, 
  Neues 
  Jahrb. 
  1847, 
  p. 
  575, 
  

   and 
  loc. 
  cit. 
  (1849), 
  p. 
  236, 
  pi. 
  xxviii. 
  figs. 
  16, 
  17.— 
  Mus- 
  

   chelkalk 
  ; 
  Upper 
  Silesia. 
  

  

  