DOl BTFl l. AND I KCU Di D SP1 C/J S (5 



Hygrophorus hudsonianus fennings, Memoirs Carnegie Mus. Ill Bot- 

 any), 12: 2. 1936. 



Bigelow lias transferred tins species to (lit<><t/l>< hudsonianus 

 (Jenn.) Bigelow, Rhodora (rl: L89. 1900. 



Hygrophorus lactus Johnson, Minn. V.cad. Sci. Hull. 1: 336. L878. 



In a communication to us dated November 23, L959, it is stated 

 that the type is not in the herbarium at the University <>l Minnesota. 



Hygrophorus montanus Murr., Mycologia3: L99. L911. 



A study of the type at the New York Botanical Garden shows thai 

 this is an Hebeloma. 



Hygrophorus multifolius ECauff., Papers Mich. Vead. Sci., Vrts and 

 Letters 5: 131. 1925. 



This is a species of Lyophyllum. 



Hygrophorus ohiensis Mont., Syll. Crypt, p. L35. L856. 



Murrill (1916) says that the specimens at Paris are \<t\ poor, and 

 are mixed with Coprinus micaceus. We have not seen the type. 



Hygrophorus queletii Bres., Fungi Trident. 1: 11. 1881. 



Murrill (1916) says that this name was applied to a New York 

 collection by Peck, but that later the specimens were referred to //. 

 pudorinus. We have not seen Peck's material nor authentic specimens 

 of Bresadola's species. 



Hygrophorus serotinus PL, N. Y. State Mus. Bull. 116: 32. 1907. 



A study of the type at Albany, N. Y., shows that this is not an 

 Hygrophorus. 



Hygrophorus stenophyllus Mont., Syll. Crypt, p. L35. L856. 



Murrill (1916) states that the "specimens at Paris are too poor to 

 compare successfully." We have not seen the type. 



Hygrophorus variolosus Fr., Nova Acta Soc. Sci. I'psal. Ill (1): 29. 

 1851. 



Murrill (1916) reports having been unable 1 to find specimens of 

 this species in Europe. He further states that Oersted, who collected it 

 in Costa Rica, made colored drawings which suggest Armillaria alphi- 

 tophylla. We have not seen the type. 



