EXPLANATION OF PLATE 103 (CIII) 



Figs. 1-10, X 35; Figs. 11-14, X 40. 

 Figures 1, 2. — Globorotalia menardii (d'Orbigny). 



Fig. 1. Challenger Sta. 224, North Pacific. (1850 fathoms) 

 Referred by Brady to Pulvinulina and by Cushman (Bull. Scripps Inst. Oceanogr., Tech. Ser., Vol. 1, No. 

 10, 1927, p. 175) to Globorotalia. 

 Figure 3. — Globorotalia menardii var. fimbriata (Brady). 

 Challenger Sta. 24, West Indies. (390 fathoms) 

 Referred by Brady to Pulvinulina and by Cushman (U.S.N.M. Bull. 104, Pt. 8, 1931, p. 94) to Globorotalia. 

 Figures 4-6. — Globorotalia tumida (Brady). 



Fig. 4. Challenger Sta. 224, North Pacific. (1850 fathoms) 

 Fig. 5. Challenger. Sta. 276, N. of Tahiti, Pacific. (2350 fathoms) 

 Referred by Brady to Pulvinulina and by Cushman (C.C.L.F.R., Vol. 3, No. 1, 1927, p. 91) to Globorotalia, 

 as genotype. 

 Figure 7. — Globorotalia scitula (Brady). 



Challenger Sta. 302, W. coast of Patagonia, E. Pacific. (1450 fathoms) 

 Referred by Brady to Pulvinulina patagonica (d'Orbigny) and by Cushman (Bull. Scripps Inst. Oceanogr., 

 Tech. Ser., Vol. 1, No. 10, p. 175) to Globorotalia scitula (Brady 1882). 

 Figures 8-10. — Globorotalia hirsuta (d'Orbigny). 



Fig. 8. Challenger Sta. 300, N. of Juan Fernandez, E. Pacific. (1375 fathoms) 

 Fig. 9. Challenger Sta. 33, off Bermuda, Atlantic. (435 fathoms) 

 Referred by Brady to Pulvinulina canariensis (d'Orbigny) and by Cushman (U.S.N.M. Bull. 104, Pt. 8, 

 1931, p. 99) to Globorotalia hirsuta (d'Orbigny). 

 Figures 11, 12. — Globorotalia punctulata (d'Orbigny). 



Fig. 11. Challenger Sta. 5, North Atlantic. (2740 fathoms) 

 Referred by Brady to Pulvinulina crassa (d'Orbigny). These figures have been the source of endless confu- 

 sion and contradictions. Galloway and Wissler (J. Pal., Vol. 1, 1927, p. 41) referred both figs, to Globigerina 

 crassaformis (Pleistocene, California); White (Jour. Pal., Vol. 2, 1928, Pt. 3, p. 191) referred fig. 11 to Globi- 

 gerina angulata, and fig. 12 to G. crassaformis Galloway and Wissler; Cushman and Stewart (Trans. San Diego 

 Soc. Nat. Hist., Vol. 6, No. 2, 1930, p. 77) referred both figures to Globorotalia crassula, ignoring earlier changes; 

 Chapman and Parr (Australasian Antarctic Exp. 1911-1914, Sci. Repts., Ser. C, Vol. 1, 1937, p. 115) referred 

 fig. 12 (not 11) to Globorotalia pseudocrassa, stating that the type of G. crassula was fig. 11, and they regard the 

 figures as representing two species; Cushman and Bermudez (C.C.L.F.R., Vol. 25, Pt. 2, 1949, p. 43) referred 

 both figs, to Globorotalia (Turborotalia) oceanica, again without reference to earlier designations. Recently 

 Phleger, Parker and Peirson (Swedish Deep-Sea Exped., 1947-48, Repts. Vol. 7, fasc. 1, 1953, p. 20) have re- 

 viewed the whole question of these two figures in detail and reached the conclusion that both figures represent 

 variations of Globorotalia punctulata (d'Orbigny). The question was also studied in less detail by Phleger and 

 Parker (Geol. Soc. Amer., Mem. 46, 1951, p. 36) who reached the conclusion that Brady's fig. 11 was Globoro- 

 talia punctulata. 

 Figures 13, 14. — Epistominella exigua (Brady). 



Fig. 13. Challenger Sta. 332, South Atlantic. (2200 fathoms) 

 Fig. 14. Challenger Sta. 160, Southern Ocean. (2600 fathoms) 

 Referred by Brady to Pulvinulina and by Cushman, Hofker, Parr and others to Pulvinulinella. Transferred 

 to Pseudoparrella Cushman and ten Dam 1948 by Phleger and Parker (Geol. Soc. Amer., Mem. 46, Pt. 2, 

 1951, p. 28). It has also been placed in Eponides, but was transferred to Epistominella Husezima and Maruhasi 

 by F. L. Parker in 1954 (Mus. Comp. Zool., Harvard, Bull., Vol. Ill, No. 10, p. 533). 



[212] 



