zation in Ustilago zeae. II. Hybridization. Minne- 

 sota Agr. Expt. Sta. Tech. Bull. 65:89-108. 



55. Christensen, J. J. 1931. Studies on the genetics 



of Ustilago zeae. Phytopathol. Z. 4:129-188. 



56. Christensen, J. J. 1942. Long distance dissem- 



ination of plant pathogens. Am. Assoc. Adv. Sci. 

 Publ. 17:78-87. 



57. Christensen, J. J., and I. J. Johnson. 1935. Field 



reaction of varieties and selfed lines of corn to 

 different collections of Ustilago zeae. J. Agr. Re- 

 search 51:47-57. 



58. Christensen, J. J., and H. A. Rodenhiser. 1940. 



Physiologic specialization and genetics of the smut 

 fungi. Botan. Rev. 6:389-425. 



59. Christensen, J. J., and E. C. Stakman. 1926. 



Physiologic specialization and mutation in Ustilago 

 zeae. Phytopathology 16:979-999. 



60. Clinton, G. P. 1900. The smuts of Illinois' agri- 



cultural plants. Illinois Agr. Expt. Sta. Bull. 57. 



61. Clinton, G. P. 1904. North American Ustilagineae. 



Proc. Boston Soc. Xatl. Hist. 31:329-529. 



62. Cobb, N. A. 1891. Diseased maize plants. Agr. Gaz. 



New South Wales 2:285. 



63. Coffman, F. A., W. H. Tisdale, and J. F. Brandon. 



1926. Observations on corn smut at Akron, Col- 

 orado. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 18:403-410. 



64. Corda, A. C. J. 1848. Der Kornbrand. Oekono- 



mische Neuigkeiten und Verhandlungen 1848:9-12. 



65. Craig, J. 1886. Observations on corn and corn 



smut. p. 16. Bull. Iowa State Agr. Coll. 



66. Craigie, J. H. 1939. Economic diseases of field 



crops in Manitoba, p. 1-37. Economic Survey- 

 Board, Manitoba, Canada. 



67. Cravioto, R. O., G. H. Massieu, J. G. Guzman, and 



J. C. de la Torre. 1951. Composition de ali- 

 mentos Mexicenos. Ciencia 11:129-155. 



68. Cugini, G. 1891. II carbone del grano turco. Bol. 



R. Staz. Agr. Modena X.S. 19:71-87. 



69. Dade, H. A. 1924. A corn disease. J. Gold Coast 



Agr. Commercial Soc. 8:84-85. 



70. Daly, J. M., and S. I. Lxj. 1950. Cultural charac- 



ters of uranium-nitrate-induced mutants of Usti- 

 lago zeae. (Abstr.) Phytopathology 40:6. 



71. Davis, G. X. 1932. Relation of axillary-bud devel- 



opment to nodal smut infection in the corn plant. 

 (Abstr.) Phytopathology 22:7-8. 



72. Davis, G. N. 1935. Some new aspects of maize 



smut. Iowa State Coll. J. Sci. 9:505-507. 



73. Davis, G. X. 1936. Some of the factors influencing 



the infection and pathogenicity of Ustilago zeae 

 (Beckm.) Unger on Zea mays L. Iowa Agr. Expt. 

 Sta. Research Bull. 199. 



74. Davis, S. 1900. Ustilago maydis. (In Russian.) 



Selsk. Choz. i. Lycsow 197:553-566. 



75. de Candoli.i:, A. P. (de Lamarck, J. B., and de 



Candolle, A. P.) 1815. Flore francaise 6. Paris. 



76. Deckenb.uh. K. X. 1925. A new parasite of smut 



fungi. La Defense des Plantes, Lenin. 2:162-165. 



77. DeVay, J. E. 1954. Amino-acid composition of 



monosporidial cultures of Ustilago zeae of different 

 sex. Phytopathology 44:583-587. 



78. DeVay, J. E., R. P. Covey, and P. X. Xair. 1957. 



Corn diseases and their importance in Minnesota 

 in 1956. Plant Disease Reptr. 41:505-507. 



79. Dickinson, S. 1926. A method of iso'ating and 



handling individual spores and bacteria. Proc. 

 Royal Soc. Med. 19:1-4. 



80. Dickson, J. G.. and D. H. Bowman. 1940. Inoc- 



ulation experiments and reaction of inbred lines 

 of corn to Ustilago zeae. Phytopathology 30:5. 



81. Dorlaxd. W. A. X. 1887. Ustilago maydis. a study 



of the drug with reference to its employment as 

 an oxytoxic. Med. Xews 51:534-536. 



82. Dragisic. B., and B. Yaricak. 1935. Yergleichende 



Untersuchungen iiber die toxische YVirkung des 

 wasserigen Extrakts aus Ustilago maydis und der 

 Mutterkornpreparale. Arch. Exptl. Pathol. Phar- 

 makol. 179:319-326. 



83. Eddins, A. H. 1929. Pathogenicity of multispo- 



84. 



85. 



87. 

 88. 

 89. 



90. 



91. 



92. 

 93. 

 94. 



95. 



96. 



97. 



98. 

 99. 



100. 

 101. 

 102. 



103. 



104. 

 105. 



106. 

 107. 

 108. 

 109. 



ridial and monosporidial cultures of Ustilago zeae 

 (Beckm.) Ung. (Abstr.) Phytopathology 19:91. 



Eddins, A. H. 1929. Pathogenicity and cultural be- 

 havior of Ustilago zeae (Beckm.) Ung. from dif- 

 ferent localities. Phytopathology 19:885-916. 



Ehrlich, H. G. 1958. Xuclear behavior in my- 

 celium of a solopathogenic line and in a cross of 

 two haploid lines of Ustilago maydis (DC.) Cda. 

 Mycologia 50:622-627. 



Eldredge, J. C. 1935. The effect of injury in imi- 

 tation of hail damage on the development of the 

 corn plant. Iowa Agr. Expt. Sta. Bull. 185. 



Enomoto, S. 1934. On the rest period and its 

 shortening in smut spores (preliminary report). 

 Trans. Sapporo Xat. Hist. Soc. 13:167-172. 



Faminzin, A. 1912. Zur Erforschung der YVirkung 

 von Tilletia tritici und Ustilago maydis auf den 

 Menschen und Haustieren. Holl. Jahresb. 15:149. 



Favret, E. A., A. P. Cercos, and A. Avila. 1954. 

 Sustancia producida por Ustilago maydis con 

 accion sobre el gluten. Rev. Invest. Agr. (Argen- 

 tina) 8:187-193. 



Feldman, A. W. 1947. Studies on the physiological 

 aspects of Ustilago zeae (Beckm.) Ung. Thesis, 

 Univ. Minnesota. 



Feldman, A. W. 1948. Investigations on the physi- 

 ology and pathogenicity of Ustilago zeae. (Abstr.) 

 Phytopathology 38:8. 



Feldman. A. VY. 1948. Physiological effect of Usti- 

 lago zeae on corn. (Abstr.) Phytopathology 38:8-9. 



Fernandez, M. Y. 1952. Introduccion a la fito- 

 patologia. 2nd ed. Gadola, Buenos Aires. 872 p. 



Ficke, C. H., and L. E. Melchers. 1929. The 

 effect of the digestive processes of animals on the 

 viability of corn and sorghum smut spores. J. 

 Agr. Research 38:633-645. 



Fischer, G. VY. 1936. The longevity of smut spores 

 in herbarium specimens. Phytopathology 26:1118- 

 1127. 



Fischer, G. VY. 1951. The smut fungi. Ronald 

 Press Co., Xew York. 387 p. 



Fischer, G. YV. 1953. Manual of the Xorth Amer- 

 ican smut fungi. Ronald Press Co., Xew York. 

 343 p. 



Fischer, G. YY., and C. S. Holton. 1957. Biology 

 and control of the smut fungi. Ronald Press Co., 

 Xew York. 622 p. 



Fischer von YY'aldheim. A. 1869-70. Beitrage zur 

 Biologie und Entwickelungsgeschichte der Ustila- 

 gineen. Jahrb. YViss. Botan. 7:61-144. (Transl. in 

 Xew York State Agr. Soc. Trans. 30:280-354. 

 1872.) 



Fleischmann, R. 1937. Einige Erfahrungen fiber 

 Maisbrand in Uncarn. Pflanzenbau 14:199-206. 



Freeman, E. M. 1905. Minnesota plant diseases. 

 St. Paul, Minnesota. 432 p. 



Freeman, E. M„ and E. C. Stakman. 1911. The 

 smuts of grain crops. Minnesota Agr. Expt. Sta. 

 Bull. 122:64. 



Gamgee, J. 1871. Ill effects of smut in the feed 

 of farm animals, p. 73-81. In Rept. Com. Agr. on 

 Diseases of Cattle in U.S. YY'ashington. 



Garber, R. J. 1931. Inbreeding with particular 

 reference to maize. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 23:534-548. 



Garber, R. J., and M. M. Hoover. 1928. Influence 

 of corn smut and hail damage on the yield of 

 certain first-generation hybrids between synthetic 

 varieties. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 20:38-45. 



Garber, R. J., and M. M. Hoover. 1928. The rela- 

 tion of smut infection to yield in maize. J. Am. 

 Soc. Agrcn. 20:735-746. 



Garber, R. J., and K. S. Quisenberry. 1925. 

 Breeding corn for resistance to smut (Ustilago 

 zeae). J. Am. Soc. Agron. 17:132-140. 



Garcia Rada, G. 1947. Fitopatologia agricola del 

 Peru. Estacion Experimental Agricola de La Mo- 

 lina, Lima, Peru. 423 p. 



Gaskin, T. A., and A. J. Ullstrup. 1958. An 

 estimate of the incidence of corn smut and of the 



36 



