A COMPARISON OF THE DIALECTS OF EAST AND WEST 
64 
quoseid qv ‘mou 
‘Avp-03—afounq 
VYIVUL VATTTOAL 
1Q-ouM 
-Avy-p-Bugm-agd-an& 
pry 
SuryAue 
jo Apoq—oupuru 
Apog 
oj UOOUt 
AIPL 
*unopuddyy, ostx ‘pno[p } 
oor Arar 
epuse.104[o0q 
Ss tI 
Ays0qqug 
TYM-TR-wUNUTt 
Injury 
O1IMY IO ooavy 049edgvy f oyoyored 
TANIY 
poor, 
VUry YUM 
tdnaq “una 
ped 
“‘peoiq PUT INOY Aoj WOALS owen Y y 
oq-lnb-oamag 
vavdey vdooy 
oypeur Baiqeut 
oyusiesu 
oreuo vinieu ‘oyyeuly. 
‘ oanvyquddng 
omy prey) PID 
wLII9q 
eune vyozeyorurd f ooyoour 
eu 
qsvoug wiog eucg 
19-BugQ-24-IL-O] 
art oornUut vid 
uruguur ‘1o<jood 
pur ord pag 
ooyoory 
oo100Ft 
tonume oe 
£1031.119, oh N 
yeo19 s,sedo0p 
vuLpuvxeTy ayey 
ystpsug 
vULIPULXETY 2 
ene 
4oa1) 8.10d00 
ALOPLUIDY, “No 
upooury 940,7 
AvINY 1OMO'T 
‘V'S preppy 
vULIpUVX]y OyvT 
yerapoon} =, Arnqsoy apy ‘109w Ay oueqstagy 
yorg Boysy 
ysypsuyy 
