POTTSVILLE CONGLOMERATE. 



G 5 . 47 



was permitted to copy in the office of the Superintendent of 

 the company, Mr. Hines, as follows ; see Fig. 3. 



1. 



2. 

 3. 

 4. 



5. 



6. 



7. 



8. 



9. 

 10. 

 11. 

 12. 

 13. 

 14. 



15. 



16. 



17. 

 18. 

 19. 

 20. 

 21. 



Middle division of XII 



Sandstone, 13' 2" ^ 



Slate, 19' 0" 



Forest City coal bed, 3' 6" 



Slate, 2' 2" 



Coal, 0' 6" 



Slate, 2' 9" 



Sandstone, hard, 42' 3" ) 



Slate, 1' 9" I 



Sandstone, 8' 8" \ 84' 10'' 



Slate, 7' 4' 



Sandstone, hard, 24' 10' 



Slate and coal, 2' 10 



Slate, . . • 10' 



Sandstone, hard, 13' 10 



r Coal, 1' 6 



Coal bed, < Slate, 



' Coal, 



Slate, 5' 4' 



Sandstone, 23' 7' 



Black dirt, ..-.,.: 3' 1' 



Slate, 1' 4' 



Dirt, 0' 8' 



Slate, 2' 7"j 



Lower division of XII. 



} 191' 4' 



1'6", 



0' 2" V 2' 



0' fi" J 



22. Sandstone, 



23. Coal, 



24. Slate, 



25. Pea Conglomerate, 



26. Slate, 



27. Pea Conglomerate, 



28. Slate, 



29. Sandstone, 



30. Slate, 



31. Pea Conglomerate, 



32. Slate, . . ' 



33. Conglomerate, (bottom of hole,) 



Total of section, (as shown,) 



28' 



r 



0' 



5 



0' 



l 



24' 



10 



4' 



9 



22' 



9 



0' 



10 



0' 



1 



> 88' 5" 



279' 9' 



By comparing these sections with those published in Mr. 

 F. Piatt's report: 1, at Blossburg in Tioga county (G, p. 

 166-7) and 2, at Mclntire in Lycoming county (GG, p. 124-5) 

 and my own section of No. XII in Mercer county, a similar 

 subdivision into Upper (conglomerate), Middle (coal bear- 



