113 
§ 8. OMPHALIA. Fr. 
1702. A. Campanella, Batsch. Reg..Rep. 23, p 85. 
Decaying wood in woods and open places. 
1703. A. Fibula. Bull. Reg. Rep. 23, p. 86. 
Mossy ground in woods and old fields. 
1704. A. gracillimus, Weinm. Reg. Rep. 25, p. 76. 
Fallen leaves and twigs in woods. 
§ 9. PLEUROTUS, Fr. 
1705. A. sapidus, Kalchbr. Reg. Rep. 29, p. 38. 
Decaying wood, stumps and trunks of trees. The spores ot 
this fungus are lilac-tinted when caught on white paper, but 
on a dark back-ground they appear sordid-white. The 
spores of A. ostreatus are said to be white. It is probable 
that these species are frequently confused. I am not sure 
that we have the true white-spored A. ostreatus. 
1706. A. salignus, Fr. Reg. Rep. 22, p. 77. 
Mossy base of trees. 
1707. A. petaloides, Bull. Reg. Rep. 22, p. 77. 
Old logs and stumps. 
1708. A. serotinus, Schrad. Reg. Rep. 31, p. 54. (P. serotinoides, Pk.) 
Reg. Rep. 23, p. 86. 
Old logs in woods. This is a mere form of the preceding 
species, differing chiefly in wanting the squamulose points on 
the stem. 
1709. A. porrigens, Pers. Reg. Rep. 24, p. 64. 
Decaying wood in woods. 
1710. A. nidulans, Pers. (Panus dorsalis, Bosc.) Reg. Rep. 22, p. 81; 30, 
ps 75, 
Decaying wood in woods. A. nidulans, Pers., and Panus 
dorsalis, Bosc., have evidently been confused, if indeed they 
are really distinct species. The specimen of ‘‘ Panus dor- 
salts, Bosc.” in Ravenel’s Fung. Car. Exsic. II, No. 13, is 
clearly not distinct from A. wzidulans, Pers. Our specimens 
have the beautiful incarnate-colored spores attributed by 
Fries to A. nidulans. 
1711. A. atroczruleus, Fr. Reg. Rep. 22, p. 77. 
Decaying wood. 
1712. A. applicatus, Batsch. Reg. Rep. 22, p. 78. 
Decaying wood. 
1713. A. striatulus, Fr. Reg. Rep. 30, p. 39. 
Decaying pine wood. 
