42 FRANCIS HEMMING 



ANAPERUS Mabille & Boullet, 1919, Ann. Sci. nat., Zool. (10) 2 (4/6) : 232. Type-species 

 through Section (i) (replacement names) of Article 67 : Eudamus caicus Herrich-Schaeffer, 

 1869, CorrespBl. zool.-min. Ver. Regensburg 23 : 188. 



This generic name was introduced as a replacement for the name Phoedinus Godman & 

 Salvin, [1894], which is invalid under the Law of Homonymy. Unfortunately, the substitute 

 name Anaperns Mabille & Boullet was itself found to be invalid under the Law of Homonymy. 

 In its turn it was replaced in 1934 by the name Caicella Hemming. 



ANAPHAEIS Hiibner, [1819], Verz. bekannt. Schmett. (6) : 93. Type-species by selection by 

 Scudder (1875, Proc. amer. Acad. Arts Sci., Boston 10 : m) : Papilio creona Cramer, 

 [1776], Uitt. Kapellen 1 (8) : 148, pi. 95, figs B, C. 



ANARTIA Hiibner, [1819], Verz. bekannt. Schmett. (3) : 33. Type-species by selection by 

 Scudder (1875, Proc. amer. Acad. Arts Sci., Boston 10 : in) : Papilio jatrophae Linnaeus, 

 1763, Amoen. acad. 6 : 408. 



ANATIELLA Fruhstorfer, 1907, Int. ent. Z. 1 (16) : 112. Type-species by monotypy ; 

 Vanessa lytrea Godart, [1819], Ency. mith. 9 (1) (Ins.) : 299. 



ANASTRUS Hiibner, [1824], Samml. exot. Schmett. 2 : pi. [149]. Type-species by monotypy : 

 Anastrus obscurus Hiibner, [1824], ibid. 2 : pi. [149], figs 3, 4 " $ " [recte " $ "] (represent- 

 ing the lectotype selected by Evans (1953, Cat. Amer. Hesp. Brit. Mus. 3 : 182). 



Evans (I.e. : 180) pointed out that Hiibner had figured two species under the name Anastrus 

 obscurus, figs 1/2, which Hiibner considered to be the male, belonging to one species, and figs 

 3 and 4, which Hiibner considered to be the female, being in reality the male of a second 

 species. Evans went on to say that Watson in 1893 — the reference presumably being to 

 Watson, 1893, Proc. zool. Soc. Lond. 1893 : 43, 54 — had selected " the second species (figs 3 

 and 4) as representing obscurus and as the type of the genus [Anastrus'] ". This does not 

 appear to be correct ; all that Watson seems to have done was to base his diagnosis of A nas- 

 trus upon Anastrus obscurus, as interpreted by Hiibner's figs 3 and 4, without commenting on 

 the composite nature of the nominal species Anastrus obscurus as established by Hiibner. 

 Watson cannot therefore be accepted as having established the interpretation of this nominal 

 species. Evans however quite definitely selected the species figured as Anastrus obscurus in 

 figs 3 and 4 on Hiibner's plate (pi. [149]) as that to which the above name should adhere, 

 to the exclusion of the species figured by Hiibner under the same name in figs 1 and 2 on the 

 same plate. Evans in this passage was the first author to make an effective lectotype selec- 

 tion for the nominal species Anastrus obscurus Hiibner, the lectotype so selected being the male 

 specimen figured (erroneously as a female) by Hiibner in figs 3 and 4 on the plate referred to 

 above. Evans added that, in his opinion, the taxon figured by Hiibner as Anastrus obscurus 

 in figs 1 and 2 of the above plate was that represented by the nominal species Papilio philemon 

 Fabricius, 1775 (Syst. Ent. : 534), placed by Evans (I.e. : 203) in the genus Ephyriades 

 Hiibner, [1819]. 



ANATOLE Hiibner, [1819], Verz. bekannt. Schmett. (2) : 24. Type-species by selection by 

 Scudder (1875, Proc. amer. Acad. Arts Sci., Boston 10 : 111) : Lemonias zvgia Hiibner, 

 [1807, Samml. exot. Schmett. 1 : pi. [35]. 



As noted by myself in 1934, Anatole Hiibner is invalid as a junior objective synonym of 

 Lemonias Hiibner, [1807 (Samml. exot. Schmett. 1 : pi. [35]), the two genera having the same 

 species as type-species. 



ANA TRYTO NE Dyar, 1905,/. N. Y. ent. Soc. 13 : 140. Type-species by original designation : 

 Hesperia delaware Edwards, 1863, Proc. ent. Soc. Philad. 2 : 19, pi. 5, 2. 



The taxon represented by the nominal species Hesperia delaware Edwards is currently on 

 taxonomic grounds either identified with, or considered to be a subspecies of, the taxon 

 represented by the nominal species Hesperia logan Edwards, 1863, Proc. ent. Soc. Philad. 2 : 

 18, pi. 1, fig. 5). Since the specific names delaware Edwards and logan Edwards were published 

 in the same work and on the same date, the relative precedence to be accorded to these names 



