46 FRANCIS HEMMING 



Scudder followed his normal practice of printing in heavy-faced black type the species which 

 he accepted as type-species and citing that species under the specific name employed for that 

 species by Kirby in 1871 in his Syn. Cat. diurn. Lep., placing immediately after each name the 

 name or names under which that species was cited by the author of the genus. In the present 

 case Scudder grouped together three of the nominal species recognized by Hiibner (the species 

 bearing the specific names menippe, vincedoxici and eresima) and treated them all (as Kirby 

 had done) as representing the same taxon as that represented by the nominal species Papilio 

 gilippus Cramer, which he then selected as type-species. Normally, such a procedure would 

 not suffice to effect a valid type-selection ; it may, however, be accepted as adequate on this 

 occasion, for, in citing the name Anosia vincedoxici Hiibner, 1816, Hiibner added that the 

 taxon so named represented the same taxon as that represented by the nominal species 

 Papilio gilippus Cramer. Under Article 69 (a) (i) the citation of the name of a nominal species 

 in the synonymy of a species recognized by the author of a genus as a valid species confers 

 upon the nominal species, the name of which is so cited, the status of an originally included 

 species. Accordingly, Papilio gilippus Cramer ranks as one of the nominal species originally 

 included by Hiibner in the genus Anosia and Scudder was therefore perfectly in order in 

 selecting Papilio gilippus as the type-species of that genus. 



ANTANARTIA Rothschild & Jordan, 1903, Novit. zool. 10 : 508. Type-species by original 

 designation : Papilio delius Drury, [1782], ///. nat. Hist. 3 : index & 18, pi. 14, figs 5, 6. 



ANTEOS Hiibner, [1819], Verz. bekannt. Schmeit. (7) : 99. Type-species by selection by 

 Godman & Salvin ([1889, Biol, centr-amer., Lep.-Rhop. 2 : 148) : Papilio maerula Fabricius, 

 1775, Syst. Ent. : 479. 



ANTEROS Hiibner, [1819, Verz. bekannt. Schmett. (5) : 77 (type-species by selection by 

 Scudder (1875, Pvoc. amer. Acad. Arts Sci., Boston 10 : 113) : Papilio formosus Cramer, 

 [1777], Uitl. Kapellen 2 (10) : 33, pi. 118, fig. G. 



ANTHANASSA Scudder, 1875, Bull. Buffalo Soc. nat. Sci. 2 : 239, 268. Type-species by 

 original designation : Eresia cincta Edwards, 1864, Proc. ent. Soc. Phi lad. 2 : 502. 



The taxon represented by the nominal species Eresia cincta Edwards is currently treated 

 subjectively on taxonomic grounds as the same as that represented by the nominal species 

 Eresia leucodesma Felder (C), & Felder (R.), 1861, Wien. ent. Monats. 5 : 103. 



ANTHENE Doubleday, 1847, List. Spec. lep. Ins. Brit. Mils. 2 : 27. Type-species by selection 

 by Hemming (Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 83 : 435) : Papilio larydas Cramer, [1780], Uitl. 

 Kapellen 3 (24) : 160, pi. 282, fig. H. 



ANTHOCARIS Hemming, 1934, Gen. Names hoi. Butts 1 : 132 (an Incorrect Subsequent 

 Spelling of Anthocharis Boisduval, Rambur & Graslin, [June 1833]). 



ANTHOCHARIS Boisduval, Rambur & Graslin, [June 1833], Coll. icon. hist. Chenilles Europ. 

 (21) : pi. 5. Type-species by monotypy : Papilio cardamines Linnaeus, 1758, Syst. Nat. 

 (ed. 10) 1 : 468. 



Formerly, it was commonly believed that the name Anthocharis Boisduval was first pub- 

 lished in [1836] in the Spec. gen. Lipid. (1 : 556) of the Hist. nat. Ins. in Roret's Suite d Buffon. 

 From the species placed in this genus in that work Doubleday ([1847, Gen. diurn. Lep. (1) : 

 56) selected Papilio cardamines as type-species. Luckily, therefore, the fact that this generic 

 name was first published in a different work did not affect the type-species of this genus. 

 Scudder (1875, Proc. amer. Acad. Arts Sci., Boston 10 : 113), who erroneously believed that 

 this generic name was first published in the Spec, gin., overlooked the type-selection made by 

 Doubleday in 1847, and supposing that this genus, as published in the above work, was still 

 without a type-species himself selected Papilio genutia Fabricius, 1793 (Ent. syst. 3 (1) : 

 193) ; this selection would have been invalid in view of Doubleday's prior action, quite apart 

 from the fact that the species selected by Scudder was not included in this genus when first 

 established by Boisduval in 1833. 



