io 4 FRANCIS HEMMING 



CELAENA Doubleday, [1849], Gen. diurn. Lep. (1) : 214. Type-species by selection by Hem- 

 ming (1941, /. Soc. Bibl. nat. Hist. 1 : 425) : Papilio fatima Fabricius, 1793, Ent. syst. 3 (1) : 

 81. 



This name was published by Doubleday in the synonymy of Anartia Hiibner, [1819] as 

 " Celaena Boisd. MSS." Under Article 11(d) of the present revised Code names published in 

 synonymies possess no status of availability. The name Celaena Doubleday, [1849] is 

 therefore invalid. 



Even if this generic name had been duly published by Doubleday, it would have been invalid 

 under the Law of Homonymy as a junior homonym of Celaena Stephens, 1829 (Nom. Brit. 

 Ins. : 41). 

 CELAENORHINUS Hiibner, [1827-1831], Zntr. z. Samml. exot. Schmett. 3 : 38 (an Incorrect 

 Subsequent Spelling of Celaenorrhinus Hiibner, [1819]). 



Although this name was published after Hiibner's death, it is attributable to Hiibner and 

 not to Geyer who completed the Zutrdge, for the whole of the text of volume 3 had been 

 written by Hiibner before his death. 



CELAENORRHINUS Hiibner, [1819], Verz. bekannt. Schmett. (7) : 106. Type-species by 

 selection by Scudder (1875, Proc. amer. Acad. Arts Sci., Boston 10 : 137) : Papilio eligius 

 Stoll, [1781], in Cramer, Uitl. Kapellen 4 (30) : 123, pi. 354, fig. H. 



CELA S TRINA Tutt, 1906, Ent. Rec. 18 : 131. Type-species by original designation : Papilio 

 argiolus Linnaeus, 1758, Syst. Nat. (ed. 10) 1 : 483. 



CELEBINA Fruhstorfer, [1899], Stett. ent. Ztg 59 (9/10) : 263. Type-species by selection by 

 Hemming (1935, Stylops 4 : 1) : Gelebina inga Fruhstorfer, [1899], ibid. 59 (9/10) : 263. 



CELOENA Boisduval, 1870, Consid. Lep. Guatemala : 38. Type-species by monotypy : 

 Papilio fatima Fabricius, 1793, Ent. syst. : 3 (1) : 81. 



This name has been somewhat overlooked through having been confused with the name 

 Celaena in which spelling it was published by Doubleday in 1849 in the synonymy of Anartia 

 Hiibner, [18 19]. That usage — full particulars of which have been given above in the discus- 

 sion on Celaena Doubleday — is invalid under Article 11(d) of the Code which provides that 

 names published in synonymies do not thereby acquire the status of availability. Doubleday's 

 action has moreover a special relevance to the present case since he stated that the name 

 Celaena, as there published by himself, was a manuscript name proposed by Boisduval. 



Boisduval was an author who habitually distributed — on labels, in correspondence or 

 otherwise — names which he had coined but had not published. Usually Boisduval published 

 these manuscript names of his at some later date but often not for many years after he had 

 first given them an irregular currency in manuscript. When he did ultimately publish such 

 names, he invariably — perhaps naturally from his point of view — published them as new 

 names of his own, irrespective of whether they had in the meantime been published by some 

 other author. This is what he did on the present occasion. It will be noted that in publishing 

 this name, Boisduval used the spelling " Celoena " and not the spelling " Celaena " used by 

 Doubleday, as the result probably of a misreading by that author of Boisduval's handwriting. 

 At the time when Boisduval did ultimately publish this name in 1870, the word Celoena had 

 not been used for a generic name by any author, and in consequence Celoena Boisduval, 1870, 

 is a nomenclatorially available name. 



CELOTES Godman & Salvin, [1899], Biol, centr .-amer . , Lep. Rhop. 2 : 452. Type-species by 

 monotypy : Pholisora nessus Edwards, 1877, Canad. Ent. 9 : 192. 



CELTIPHAGA Barnes & Lindsey, 1922, Ann. ent. Soc. Amer. 15 : 92. Type-species by 

 original designation : Apatura celtis Boisduval & Leconte, [1834], Hist. gen. icon. Lipid. 

 Chen. Amer. sept. (25) : 210, pi. 57, figs 1, 2 (imago), 3 (larva), 4 (pupa). 



CEPHISE Evans, 1952, Cat. Amer. Hesp. Brit. Mus. 2 : 136, 153. Type-species by original 

 designation : Eudamus cephise Herrich-Schaeffer, 1869, CorrespBl. zool.-min. Ver. Regens- 

 23 : 186 — in re-paged separate as " Prodr. ... 3 : 66 ". 



