GENERK NAMES Of BUTTERFLIES 119 



144). After referring to the actum which he had just taken in the case of Chlosyne Butler, 

 Scudder went on to express the taxonomic view that not all the species placed by Kirby in 

 Coatlantona could be regarded as being congeneric with one another ; he went on to express 

 the nomenclatorially erroneous view that in these circumstances those of Kirby's species 

 which were not removed to Chlosyne as the result of the type-selection for that genus which he 

 himself had just made could be left in the genus Coatlantona, for which he thereupon selected 

 Papilio nana labia ius, 1793 (Ent. syst. 3 (1) : 240) to be the type-species. This action was, 

 of course, invalid, for Coatlantona must, as a replacement name for Synchloe, take the same 

 species as type-species, and Scudder himself had already selected Papilio janais Drury as its 

 type-species through his ai tion in selecting that species as the type-species of the older 

 replacement name Chlosyne Butler.) 



The name Coatlantona Kirby is invalid as a junior objective synonym of Chlosyne Butler, 

 1870. 



COBALOIDES Hayward, 1938, .///. Soc. cicnr. argent. 126 : 448, fig. 9 (venation). Type- 

 species by original designation : Cobaloides argus Haywaxd, 1938, ibid. 126 : 449, text- 

 fig. 21 (J genit, 2 figs). 



COBALOPS1S C.odman, [1900], in Godman & Salvin, Biol, centr.-amer., Lep. Khop. 2 : 537. 

 Type-species by original designation : Pamphila edda Mabille, 1891, Bull. C. R. Soc. ent. 

 Belg. 35 : clxx. 



The taxon represented by the nominal species Pamphila edda is currently treated subjec- 

 tively on taxonomic grounds as representing the same taxon as that represented by the older- 

 established nominal species Hesperia autumna P16tz, 18X3 [Stett. ent. 7.1^ 44 : 43). 



COBALUS Hiibner, [1819], Yerz. behannt. Schmelt. (8) : 115. Type-species by selection by 

 Butler (1870, Ent. mon. Mm;. 7 : 92): Papilio virbius Cramer, [1777], Uitl. Kapellenl (12) : 

 7.5. pi. 243, fig- G. 



COCCEIUS Godman A Salvin, [894], Biol, centr.-amer., Lep. Khop. 2 : 336. Type-species by 

 original designation : Eudamus pylades Scudder, 1870, Proc. Boston Soc. nat. Hist. 13 : 

 207. 



CODATRACTUS Lindsey, 1921, Univ. Iowa Studies nat. Hist. 9 (No. 4) : 26. Type-species 

 through Section (i) (replacement names) of Article 67 : Heteropia imitatrix Mabille, 1889, 

 Le Naluralisle (2) 11 : 68. 



Lindsey established the nominal genus Codatractus as a replacement for Heteropia Mabille, 

 1889, the name of which is invalid under the Law of Homonymy. 



Lindsey designated Heteropia imitatrix Mabille as the type-species of his Codatractus, but 

 this action was unnecessary, for that species, as the type-species (by selection by Watson, 

 1893) of the replaced genus Heteropia Mabille is automatically the type-species also of its 

 replacement name Codatractus. 



The taxon represented by the nominal species Heteropia imitatrix Mabille is currently 

 treated as representing the same taxon as that represented by the older established nominal 

 species Telegonus imalena Butler, 1872 (Lepid. exot. : 109, pi. 40, fig. 1). Further, the taxon 

 represented by the nominal species Telegonus imalena Butler is itself currently treated as 

 representing a subspecies of the taxon represented by the older-established nominal species of 

 Eudamus bryaxis Hewitson, 1867 (Descr. One Hundred new Spec. Hesp. [1] : 11). 



COEA Hiibner, [1819], Verz. bekannt. Schmelt. (3) : 48. Type-species by selection by Scudder 

 (1875, Proc. amer. Acad. Arts Sci., Boston 10 : 144) : Papilio acheronta Fabricius, 1775, 

 Syst. Ent. : 501. 



The taxon represented by the nominal species Papilio acheronta Fabricius is currently 

 treated subjectively on taxonomic grounds as representing the same taxon as that represented 

 by the nominal species Papilio cadmus Cramer, [1775] (Uitl. Kapellen 1 (2) : 33, pi. 22, 

 figs A, B). This one of the cases in which two nominal species established in the same year 

 are considered to represent the same taxon and there has been doubt as to which of the names 



