206 FRANCIS HEMMING 



have been due to some confusion in his notes, for Kirby did not designate a type-species for 

 this genus and indeed did not cite Halpe ceylonica at all. 



Finally, it must be noted that in 1949 (loc. cit. : 260) Evans treated the taxon represented by 

 the nominal species Halpe moorei Watson as being the same as that represented by the older- 

 established nominal species Hesperilla porns Mabille, 1876 {Bull. Soc. ent. Fr. (5) 6 : cxcix). 

 HAMADRYAS Hiibner, [1806], Tentamen : [1]. Type-species by monotypy : Papilio io Linnaeus, 

 1758, Syst. Nat. (ed. 10) 1 : 472. 



The name Hamadryas Hiibner, as of the Tentamen, is invalid, because by the ruling given 

 by the Commission in its Opinion 97 (1926, Smithson. miscell. Coll. 73 (No. 4) : 19-30) ; 

 republished in 1958, Opin. int. Comm. zool. Nom. 1 (B) : 355-366) the leaflet in which it 

 appeared was rejected as being unavailable for the purposes of zoological nomenclature. 



This generic name has been placed on the Official Index of Rejected and Invalid Generic 

 Names in Zoology as Name No. 82. 

 HAMAD RYAS Hiibner, [1806], Samml. exot. Schmett. 1 : pi. [47]. Type-species by monotypy : 

 Papilio amphinome Linnaeus, 1767, Syst. Nat. (ed. 12) 1 (2) : 779. 



The rejection by the Commission of Fliibner's Tentamen and the consequent invalidation of 

 the name Hamadryas as published in that leaflet made it necessary to ascertain where this 

 name was next published. This turned out to be in volume 1 of the Samml. exot. Schmett. of 

 the same author. From the species included in the genus Hamadryas I selected (1933, Entomo- 

 logist 66 : 197) Papilio feronia Linnaeus, 1758 (figured on Hiibner's plate [48]) to be the type- 

 species of this genus. Later, the discovery of Hiibner's manuscripts showed that, contrary 

 to what had previously been believed, the plates in the Sammlung depicting species referred to 

 the genus Hamadryas were not published simultaneously but had appeared on various dates 

 between 1806 and 1814. Plate [48] referred to above was seen not have been published until 

 1 813; it followed that the selection of Papilio feronia as the type-species of Hamadryas made 

 in 1933 was automatically invalid. It was seen also that only one plate of a Hamadryas 

 species was published in 1806. This was plate [47], depicting Papilio amphinome , and that 

 species is accordingly the type-species by monotypy. 

 HAMADRYAS Boisduval, [1832], in d'Urville, Voy. "Astrolabe", Faun. ent. 1 (Lep.) : 91. 

 Type-species by selection by Moore (Proc. zool. Soc. Lond. 1883 : 253) : Papilio zoilus Fabri- 

 cius, 1775, Syst. Ent. : 480. 



The name Hamadryas Boisduval, as being a junior homonym of Hamadryas Hiibner, [1806] 

 is invalid. It has been replaced by the name Tellervo Kirby, 1894. 



HAMADRYODES Moore, [1898], Lep. ind. 3 (32) : 146. Type-species by original designa- 

 tion : Athyma lactaria Butler, 1866, Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. (3) 17 : 98. 



When establishing the genus Hamadryodes and designating its type-species in Part 32 of the 

 Lep. ind., Moore gave no generic diagnosis for this taxon; he made good this deficiency how- 

 ever in Part 34 (: 215), published later in the same year. 



The taxon represented by the nominal species Athyma lactaria Butler is currently treated 

 subjectively on taxonomic grounds as being the same as that represented by the older- 

 established nominal species Limenitis praslini Boisduval, [1832] (in d'Urville, Voy. " Astro- 

 labe ", Faun. ent. 1 (Lep.) : 131). 



HAMADRYOPSIS Oberthur, 1894, Etud. ent. 19 : 17. Type-species by monotypy : Hamadry- 

 opsis drusillodes Oberthur, 1894, ibid. 19 : 17, pi. 2, figs. 4, 4a. 



Fruhstorfer in 1908, (Verh. zool.-bot. Ges. Wien. 58 (6/7) : 217) subjectively identified 

 Hamadryopsis drusillodes Oberthur, 1894, with Drusillopsis dohertyi Oberthur, 1894, (loc. cit. 

 19 : 16, pi. 2, figs 3, 3a). As these names of Oberthur's were published in the same work 

 and on the same date, the relative precedence to be accorded to the specific names drusillodes 

 and dohertyi depends on the choice made by the First Reviser. This choice was made in the 

 paper cited above, Fruhstorfer in it adopting dohertyi and treating drusillodes as a junior 

 synonym of that name. Accordingly, from the standpoint of workers who accept the synonymy 

 established by Fruhstorfer, the specific name drusillodes Oberthur (the specific name of the 



