208 FRANCIS HEMMING 



synonym, the name Hames acquired no status of availability thereby (Article 11(d)) and is 

 therefore invalid. Even if the name Hames Westwood had been available it would have been 

 invalid as a junior objective synonym of Arpidea Duncan, 1837. 



HANIPHA Moore, [1880], Lep. Ceylon 1 (1) : 18. Type-species by original designation : 

 Lethe sihala Moore, 1872, Proc. zool. Soc. Lond. 1872 : 555. 



The taxon represented by the nominal species Lethe sihala Moore is currently treated sub- 

 jectively on taxonomic grounds as being the same as that represented by the older-established 

 nominal species Debts dynsate Hewitson, [1863] (77/. exot. Butts 3 : [76], pi. [38], figs 9, 10 $). 



HANSA Evans, 1955, Cat. amer. Hesp. Brit. Mus. 4 : 303, 370. Type-species by original 

 designation : Hesperia hyboma Plotz, 1886, Stett. ent. Ztg 47 : 101. 



HANTANA Moore, [1881], Lep. Ceylon 1 (4) : 179. Type-species by original designation : 

 Eudamus infernus Felder (R.), 1868, Verh. zool.-bot. Ges. Wien 18 : 283. 



The taxon represented by the nominal species Eudamus infernus Felder is currently treated 

 subjectively on taxonomic grounds as being the same as that represented by the nominal 

 species Eudamis spilothyrus Felder (R.), 1868 (loc. cit. 18 : 283). As these names are of equal 

 date — having actually been published on the same page of the same volume — the relative 

 precedence to be accorded to them depends on the choice made by the First Reviser. This 

 choice was made in 1927 {I dent. ind. Butts (ed. 1) : 214) by Evans who gave preference to 

 the specific name spilothyrus Felder over the name infernus Felder, sinking the latter as a 

 junior synonym of the former. On the basis of the foregoing synonymy the valid specific 

 name for the taxon here in question is spilothyrus Felder. 



HANTANUS Swinhoe, [1912], in Moore, Lep. ind. 9 (108) : 273 (an Incorrect Subsequent Spell- 

 ing of Hantana Moore, [1881]). 

 HARAMBA Moore, [1897], Lep. ind. 3 (27) : 49. Type-species by original designation : 



Adolias appiades Menetries, 1857, Enum. Corp. Anim. Mus. imp. Acad. Sci. petrop. (2) : 120 



pi. 9, fig. 4. 



When establishing the nominal genus Haramba, Moore designated a type-species for it but 



did not give a generic diagnosis. This omission w-as made good by Moore later in the same 



year in Part 28 (: 86) of the same volume. 



The taxon represented by the nominal species Adolias appiades Menetries is currently 



treated subjectively on taxonomic grounds as the same as that represented by the older- 

 established nominal species Nymula julii Lesson, 1837 {in Bougainville, /. navig. autour Globe 



Fregatle " La Thetis " 2 : 345, pi. 44, figs 4, 4 bis). 

 HARIDRA Moore, [1880], Lep. Ceylon 1 (1) : 30. Type-species by selection by Moore ([1895] 



Lep. ind. 2 (22) : 229) : Charaxes psaphon Westwood, 1847, Cabinet orient. Entom. : 43, 



pi. 21, figs 1, 2 o". 

 HARIMA Moore, [1892], Lep. ind. 1 (12) : 299. Type-species by original designation : Neope 



callipteris Butler, 1877, Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. (4) 19 : 92. 



The name Harima Moore was published on the same date (and in the same work) as the 



name Sinchula Moore, and in consequence the relative precedence to be accorded to these names 



depends on the choice made by the First Reviser. This was made by myself in 1964 (Annot. 



lep. (3) : 78), when I chose the name Sinchula Moore to take precedence over the name Harima 



Moore. 

 HARIMALA Moore, [1881], Lep. Ceylon 1 (4) : 145. Type-species by original designation : 



Papilio crino Fabricius, 1793, Ent. syst. 3 (1) 15. 

 HARMA Doubleday, [1848], Gen. diurn. Lep. (2) : pi. 40, fig. 3. Type-species by monotypy : 



Harma theobene Doubleday, [1848], ibid. (2) : pi. 40, fig. 3. 



The relevant text was not published until 1850 (: 287) when it appeared in the portion of 



the above work prepared by Westwood after Doubleday's death. 

 HARMILLA Aurivillius, 1892, Ent. Tidskr. 13 : 200. Type-species by monotypy : Harmilla 



elegans Aurivillius, 1892, ibid. 13 : 200. 



