34 Cc. M. F. von HAYEK 
Adelocera gibberosus (Fleutiaux) comb. n. 
Agraeus gibberosus Fleutiaux, 1935a : 29. 
Holotype. Matraya: 9, Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, 14 Mile, S. Buloh, May 25th, 
1932. H. M. Pendlebury, Ex. Coll. F.M.S. Museum; Brit. Mus. 1934 : 80; Agraeus 
sp. G. E. Bryant det; Agraeus gibberosus Fleut., type [Fleut.] (BMNH). 
Adelocera hilaris (Candéze) 
Lacon hilaris Candéze, 1891a : 744. 
Adelocera hilaris (Candéze) Fleutiaux, 1926 : 96. 
The description is based on a single specimen (MCSN, Genoa) collected in 
Carin Cheba (see p. 275) in December 1888 by Fea. 
The inclusion of hilaris Candéze in Adelocera is tentative, based on Candéze’s 
comment that it is “comme le precedent’ which is trifasciatus Candéze (= Adelocera 
microcephalus Motschulsky, see p. 38). 
Adelocera incisus (Fleutiaux) comb. n. 
Brachylacon incisus Fleutiaux, 1940b : 32. 
Brachylacon incisus Fleutiaux; Lesne, 1940 : 36. 
LECTOTYPE (present designation). BOoRNEo: 9, Sandakan, Borneo, Baker; 
Brachylacon incisus Fleut., type [Fleut.] (MNHN, Paris). 
The lectotype differs from the description in that the prosternal process is not 
grooved, though there is a slight depression between the anterior coxae. The 
metepisterna are not parallel-sided but triangular and not visible beyond a point 
just posterior to the distal end of the metasternal tarsal groove. It would appear 
that Fleutiaux misinterpreted the longitudinal carinae on the epipleurae as the 
suture between the metepisterna and the epipleurae (see also P. alluaudi, p. 16). 
Adelocera indicus (Fleutiaux) comb. n. 
Agvaeus indicus Fleutiaux, 1935a : 22. 
LECTOTYPE (present designation). Inp1A: 3, Nilgiri Hills; 1280; Andrewes, 
indicus Fleut., type [Fleut.], indicus n.sp. [Fleut.] (MNHN, Paris). 
Paralectotypes. Inp1a: I 3, Nilgiri Hills, H.L. [sic] Andrewes, Agraeus indicus 
Fleut. [Fleut.] (BMNH). 1 3, Nilgiri Hills (BMNH). 
Fleutiaux records the locality as ‘Nilgiri Hills, Ouchterlony Valley, 3-500 ft, 
fevrier et aout, en battent les abres (H. C. Andrewes), coll. H. E. Andrewes.’ I 
have not been able to discover a specimen bearing this information. It is possible 
that the number 1280 on the lectotype refers to a list of localities and biological 
data which is now lost. 
