RECLASSIFICATION OF SUBFAMILY AGRYPNINAE 65 
Candéze (1891 : 13) records Adelocera tristis Kraatz (1882 : 319) as a synonym 
of funebris. The synonymy has not been confirmed. 
Adelocera tristis Kraatz. The description is based on an unrecorded number of 
specimens (‘ziemlich selten’) collected by Haberhauser near Samarkand. 
Type-material: ?Kraatz collection, DEI, Eberswalde (Horn, 1935; 141). 
Lacon ganglbauri (Schwarz) 
Adelocera ganglbauri Schwarz, 1894 : 145. 
Lacon ganglbauri (Schwarz) Fleutiaux, 1926 : 93. 
The description is based on two specimens from Beirut [LEBANON], Appl., 1878 
in the NM, Vienna. 
The generic attribution is based on the description. 
Lacon geographicus (Candéze) comb. rev. 
Adelocera geographica Candéze, 1865 : 7. 
Lacon geographicus (Candéze) Fleutiaux, 1926 : 93. 
Sulcilacon geographicus (Candéze) Fleutiaux, 1941¢ : 48. 
LECTOTYPE (present designation). BornrEo: 3g, Borneo 1426; Sar. 874; 
Janson coll. 1903.130; Adelocera geographica Cdz. [Cand.]; Adelocera geographica 
Cand., type [Gahan] (BMNH). 
Lacon graeca (Candéze) 
Adeloceva graeca Candéze, 1857 : 61. 
Lacon graeca (Candéze) Fleutiaux, 1926 : 93. 
LECTOTYPE (present designation). 4g, graeca type [Fleut.]; graeca Cand. 
type, Collection Chevrolat; [Fleut.]._ The specimen stands beside a Chevrolat label: 
Adelocera graeca (Chev.) Cand. Mon.1. 1857 p. 61 13. Coll. Chevrolat (MNHN, 
Paris.) 
The published locality is ‘Gréce’ [GREECE]. 
Lacon impressicollis (Say) comb. rev. 
Elatey impressicollis Say, 1825 : 260. 
Adelocera senilis Germar, 1840 : 259. [Synonymized by Candeze, 1859 : 58.] 
Adelocera impressicollis (Say) LeConte, 1853 : 490. 
Lacon impressicollis (Say) Fleutiaux, 1926 : 490. 
Zalepia impressicollis (Say) Arnett, 1969 : IT. 
Elater impressicollis Say. Say proposed this name for Elater fuscus Melsheimer 
(1806 : 44, nomen nudum) which he regarded as preoccupied, presumably by 
Elater fuscus Fabricius (1801). Say does not record a locality or state whether he 
based his description on Melsheimer’s specimens or on material in his own collection. 
Say’s own material is presumed lost (see p. 279). Horn (1936: 127) states that 
E 
