————— 
RECLASSIFICATION OF SUBFAMILY AGRYPNINAE 207 
Agrypnus samburensis (Fleuteaux) comb. n. 
Lacon samburensis Fleutiaux, 1919 : 22. 
Tylotarsus (Lobitarsus [sic}) samburensis (Fleutiaux), 1935¢ : 94 
LECTOTYPE (present designation). KENYA: 3, Samburu; Lacon samburensis 
Fleut. type [Fleut].; Fleut. Vaj. All. Jeannel. Afr. or. Elat. p. [Fleut.] (MNHN, 
Paris). 
Paralectotype. 3, Samburu, 30.x to 20.xi.g6 (MNHN, Paris). 
Agrypnus scaber (Candéze) comb. n. 
Lacon scaber Candéze, 1857 : 53. 
Lacon scabey Candéze; Neboiss, 1961 : 9. 
Holotype. Mapacascar: 3g, Lafert. Madagascar; ... [illegible word] Madag.?; 
285; S. scaber Cdz. type [Cand.]; Lacon scaber Cdze, Cand. type. e coll. de Laferte 
[Janson] (BMNH). 
Agrypnus scarrosus (Candéze) comb. n. 
Lacon scarrosus Candéze, 1857 : 157. 
Pyrganus scarvrosus (Candéze) Golbach, 1968 : 108. 
LECTOTYPE (present designation). Merxico: ¢ Tuspan; 761; E. scarrosus 
[Cand.]; Collection Chevrolat; scarrosus Cand., typ. Mon. p. 157 [Fleut.] (MNHN, 
Paris). The specimen stands over a green Chevrolat collection label; Lacon scarrosus 
Chevr. Cand. type Mon. 1. p. 157, no. 88, Collection Chevr. D. A. Salle. 
Paralectotype. 9, Mexico, Janson coll. 1903.130; Lacon scarrosus Cand. Cand. 
Type e coll. de Laferte [Janson]; scarrosus, [sic.] Mexico Chevr. [? Chevr.] (BMNH). 
It is of interest to note that the lateral margins of the prothorax of the paralecto- 
type are distinctly, ifirregularly crenate. (cf. Golbach’s generic diagnosis of Pyrganus), 
Agrypnus schwaneri (Candéze) comb. n. 
Lacon schwanert Candéze, 1874 : 73. 
Adeloceva (Compsolacon) schwaneri (Candéze); Van Zwaluwenburg, 1959 : 354. 
Lectotype (Van Zwaluwenburg, 1959 : 354, see p. 9). Sex undetermined. 
Borneo (RNH, Leiden). It seems probable that Van Zwaluwenburg’s statement 
‘[type] designated by Candéze’ indicates that the specimen bears Candéze’s deter- 
mination label, possibly with the word ‘type’. Candéze’s second specimen, in the 
Van Bruck collection, was lost in the bombing of Bonn (Van Zwaluwenburg, loc. 
cit.). 
The generic attribution is based on the description. 
