248 Cc. M. F. von HAYEK 
> 
[Janson]; Specimen communicated to Candéze and returned as ‘Agryp. Mastersii 
Mc.L. var. C. A. ereptus Jans. Mss’ [Janson] (BMNH). 
The name erepitus, which was first published in synonymy (see above), was made 
available by Van Zwaluwenburg’s treatment of it as an available name with its 
original authorship and date, and his adoption of it as the name of a taxon (IRZN, 
Article 11(d), 1963 emendation). 
Lanelater fallaciosus (Fairmaire) comb. n. 
Agrypnus fallaciosus Fairmaire, 1892 : Iol. 
LECTOTYPE (present designation). F.T.A.I. [previously French Somaliland]: 
2, Obock (Aubert); fallaciosus Fairm. n.sp. [Fairm.] (MNHN, Paris). 
Paralectotype: 1 9, Obock; fallaciosus Frm. type [Fairm, date illegible]; Museum 
Paris. Coll. Abeille de Perrin (MNHN, Paris). 
The species was described (loc. cit.: 80) as ‘assez commun’ but only the above 
two specimens have been located. 
This species is not listed in the main body of the Schenkling (1925) catalogue 
and is assumed to have been overlooked by Arnett (1957). See p. 241. 
Lanelater fleutiauxi nom. n. 
Agrypnus eveptus Fleutiaux, 1902@: 165. [Junior primary homonym of Agrypnus ereptus 
Candéze, 1874 : 13.] 
Lanelatey eveptus (Fleutiaux) Arnett, 1952 : 105. 
LECTOTYPE (present designation). AUSTRALIA: 9, Australie; Sud. Austr.; 
A. ereptus Jans. in litt. [Cand.] Candéze det. [Fleut.]; A. ereptus Fleut., type 
[Fleut.]; ereptus Fleut., Bull. Soc. Ent. Fr. 1902 p. 164 [Fleut.] (MNHN, Paris). 
Van Zwaluwenburg (1959 : 349) comments that Fleutiaux’s description does 
not agree with the lectotype of eveptuws Candéze. The explanation is that although 
Fleutiaux refers to A. mastersi var. c Candéze = eveptus Jans. in litt.’ he based 
his description not on Candéze’s specimen from Nicol Bay, N.W. Australia (see 
p- 247) but on a specimen from an unknown locality in S. Australia in his own 
collection. The two specimens are not conspecific. 
Lanelater funestus (Candéze) comb. n. 
Agrypnus funestus Candéze, 1857 : 35. 
Agrypnus funestus Candéze; Fleutiaux, 1926 : 93. [Restored tospecificstatus. Notasynonym 
of aequalis Candéze.] 
The description is based on an unrecorded number of specimens from ‘Des Indes 
Orientiales’ (see p. 271). There are no specimens from this locality with Candéze’s 
determination label in the BMNH or IRSNB, Brussels. 
The interpretation of the species is based on the following specimen, the only 
one with Candéze’s determination label known to me: 1 3g, Deyr. India; Janson 

