RECLASSIFICATION OF SUBFAMILY AGRYPNINAE 249 
coll. 1903.130; A. funestus [Cand.]; Agrypnus funestus Cdze, Cand. e coll. Deyrolle 
[Janson] (BMNH). The specimen which may be a syntype, is not conspecific 
with A. moestus Candéze and giluus Candéze as recorded by Fleutiaux (1926 : 93). 
Lanelater fuscipes (Fabricius) 
Elater fuscipes Fabricius, 1775 : 211. 
Agrypnus fuscipes (Fabricius) Germar, 1840 : 253. 
Lanelater fuscipes (Fabricius) Arnett, 1952 : 105. 
The description is based on an unrecorded number of specimens from ‘India 
orientali Koenig’. Koenig collected at Tranquebar in Southern India (Zimsen, 
1964: 12). The two specimens in the UZM, Copenhagen, recorded by Zimsen 
(1964 : 158), may be syntypes. 
The generic attribution is based on material standing over this name in the 
BMNH and MNHN, Paris. 
Lanelater fusiformis (Candéze) 
Agrypnus fusiformis Candéze, 1857 : 39. 
Lanelater fusiformis (Candéze) Arnett, 1952 : 105. 
Holotype. Curina: Chine meridionale, Mniszech collection from Buquet. The 
material is in the IRSNB, Brussels according to Fleutiaux (1947: 290). Not 
examined. 
The confirmation of Arnett’s generic attribution is based on the description. 
Lanelater gestroi (Candéze) 
Agrypnus gestroi Candéze, 1880 : 188. 
Lanelater gestyvoi (Candéze) Arnett, 1952 : 105. 
Lectotype (designated by Binaghi, 1941) : 88). NEw GUINEA: 3, Nuova Guinea, 
Fly River 1876-77, legit L. M. D’Albertis (CMSN, Milan). Not examined. 
The description is based on an unrecorded number of specimens. Binaghi 
records only one specimen. He does not state whether it bears Candéze’s determina- 
tion label. 
The confirmation of Arnett’s generic diagnosis is based on the description. 
Lanelater grandis (Hope) 
Agrypnus grandis Hope, 1842 : 428. 
Lanelatey grandis (Hope) Van Zwaluwenburg, 1959 : 350. 
Lectotype (designated by Van Zwaluwenburg, 1959). AUSTRALIA: 9, grandis 
Hope, Pt. Ess. [Hope] (UM, Oxford). 
