RECLASSIFICATION OF SUBFAMILY AGRYPNINAE 261 
The description is based on an unrecorded number of specimens in the MCSN, 
Genoa. Binaghi records only one specimen. He does not state whether it bears 
Candéze’s determination label. 
Confirmation of Arnett’s generic attribution is based on the description. 
Lanelater renardi (Candéze) 
Agrypnus venardi Candéze, 1890 : CXLVIII. 
Lanelater venardi (Candéze) Arnett, 1952 : 105. 
The description is based on 1 ex. from Tetara and 2 ex. from Konbir [INnp1A] 
collected by Cardon (see p. 273). 
Syntypes: ? IRSNB, Brussels. 
Confirmation of Arnett’s generic attribution is based on the description. 
Lanelater resectus (Candéze) 
Agrypnus resectus Candéze, 1857 : 45. 
Lanelater vesectus (Candéze) Arnett, 1952 : 105. 
The description is based on a single specimen from Nouvelle Hollande 
[AUSTRALIA] bearing the name Agrypnus australasiae Dup. in the Mniszech 
collection. 
Holotype: IRSNB, Brussels according to Neboiss (1961 : 5). Not confirmed. 
Confirmation of Arnett’s generic attribution is based on specimens standing 
as vesectus in the BMNH. 
Lanelater robustus (Fleutiaux) 
Agrypnus vobustus Fleutiaux, 1902a@ : 163. 
Lanelater vobustus (Fleutiaux) Arnett, 1952 : 105. 
LECTOTYPE (present designation). JAvaA: gj, Java, Agrypnus robustus Fleut., 
type [Fleut.] (MNHN, Paris). 
Paralectotypes. I ex., Java. 6 3, 5 9, Java occident. Pengalengen, 4000, 
1893. H. Fruhstorfer. One specimen bears Fleutiaux’s determination label. 
I dg, 1 9, Palaboean, Java, S.O. 1 4, 3 9, Soekaboemi, Java, Rouyer (MNHN, 
Paris). These 18 specimens stood beside Fleutiaux’s type-specimen in the Fleutiaux 
collection. Since they fall within the published size-range of 38-45 mm, it seems 
safe to assume that Fleutiaux had them before him at the time of the description. 
| Lanelater rubiginosus (Candéze) 
| Agrypnus rubiginosus Candéze, 1865 : 5. 
Lanelater rubiginosus (Candéze) Arnett, 1952 : 105. 
| Lectotype (designated by Van Zwaluwenburg, 1959 : 351). SUMATRA: 9, Miiller, 
