xe tf wR 
weer 
) Gik) BM+EwRAtTH 。 oe 
こる 2 
ーー 
ーー ーー 
nik 
(PD) <VRh? BKM SS 
5 x8 
SEH feo” Same AS 
OP!) mjc m 2 ERR SERRE SO” EE KY 
Bie O BAIN 0 SHEVA pO PHD 
い ^ 2 SS+2]1|+ THRBEROBERRY 
SW | BweBReKR Lea’ |<v-VvSare 
WON oO" RRO Rt | Sm 
WEE X< fC Bie oom (te eli o” BS 
§O Bm eSB wo wo Re LS 
ER WITS ON 10 19-2 2 ORE A SA 2S 
WR HOw RPI Ov | MSV eR Yo 
Res? HEE Deve | BO-oM Eww 
RWW” MEI RAOCRVUWHAN www ¢ 
で と LOVA VMS HR EO HAY? ROR 
SR din 2 8 BR 28 BAH HST QA dont) 28 Qn & OB 
OswHee eo” NC Pgs O Mie stom) Re 
oO mr Bette 0 QE Oo W420 
@a8 i YB Bw) 
mj eS 
III. Cordyceps Henleyae Masse, Ann, Bot. VIII, 
P, 119. et. Rev. Mycol 1899. P. 3. t. 179. f. 1-12. 
S Saccardo Sylloge Fung. Vol XIV. P, 662 

IPL eee ee ee eee 
I OMURERHR nA + ae URRY Henle- 
yaeti< OSS 10-9 QO” RANE a 1 IES 
fi S Massee WN CWE RRO” MBOMMa ws | 
7? Pertimw+id hs Annales of Botany #2441 3% 
\W* A Revision of the Genus Cordgceeks. wH)~ x 
ite = ° 
HHS KS wo BRS Hckiales ORMOMOR 
Boo BER egg” Mh hse es dim | RR 
HINOS Omna|» 8 Of C5” BIER Ve 
SSR REEX O° SBR” BIH by 2S See 00 
SRR 1 Sey Sw be [Rin SR 
tons W125 $2) RW OOo”? WI we 
Bier BME OWRO | No QO BEY 
ALARA KL RRR CR 1 OF 
モー § 22 (RK ORROL)ERER~* tp 
PRG 26 AA et) dH BE Ae BR AMI UR aU 
MEPL NINN [ES Qu ehhon® Simmel % MAR SS 
Robe’ Bii~+mA~-Ve- Bere 
Eww’ RBOSP wiht” Bh 2 we 
deiK4e* SKES LY OP aR ISM Sho 0 AR 48 
Ov Re? BOW YO PRS RR 
WMOuw ht —Owkwi [writ -SBRe” Bile ws 
oy 76 Na BS 28 | [OHH ES or — tH RBS SR m° 
1) S486 Hekiales Q | HORBUHS ” WK 
AN と へ KGKRM AS XM UM. Henley KX 




