GECKO CLASSIFICATION 



121 



Rosier, H. 2001. Zur Rumpfbeschuppung der Gattung Phelsuma Gray, 1825: 

 Zoogeographische Aspekte (Sauna: Gekkonidae). Gekkota 3: 47-73. 



& Wranik, W. 200 1 . Bemerkungen zur Fortpflanzungsbiologie von Geckonen — 



2. Untersuchungen zur Reprpoduktion von Pristurus obsli Rosier & Wranik. 1999 

 und Pristurus sokotrunus Parker. 1938 im Vergleich zu anderen Geckos (Sauria: 

 Gekkonidae). Gekkota 3: 125-182. 



Ruibal, R. & Ernst, V. 1965. The structure of the digital setae of lizards. Journal of 

 Morphology 117: 271-294. 



Russell, A.P. 1 972. The foot ofgekkonid lizards: a study in comparative and functional 

 anatomy. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. University of London. England. 



1 976. Some comments concerning interrelationships amongst gekkonine geckos. 



pp.217-244. In: Bellairs. A.d'A. & Cox, C.B. (eds). Morphology and Biology of 

 Reptiles. Linnean Society Symposium Series 3. Academic Press. London. 



1977a. The phalangeal formula of Hemidactylus Oken, 1817 (Reptilia: 



Gekkonidae): a correction and a functional explanation. Anatomia Histologic! 

 Embryologia 6: 332-338. 



1977b. The genera Rkoptropus and Phelsuma (Reptilia: Gekkonidae) in Southern 



Africa: a case of convergence and a reconsideration of the biogeography of Phelsuma. 

 Zoologica Africana 12: 393-408. 



1979. Parallelism and integrated design in the foot structure of gekkonine and 



diplodactyline geckos. Copeia 1979: 1-21. 



& Bauer, A.M. 1988. Paraphalangeal elements ofgekkonid lizards: a compara- 

 tive survey. Journal of Morphology 197: 221-240. 



& 1989. The morphology of the digits of the golden gecko. Calodactylodes 



aureus (Reptilia: Gekkonidae) and its implications for the occupation of rupicolous 

 habitats. Amphibia-Reptilia 10: 125-140. 



& 1990. Digit I in pad-bearing gekkonine geckos: alternate designs and the 



potential constraints of phalangeal number. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum 

 29:453^172. 



& 1993. Aristelliger Cope. Caribbean geckos. Catalogue of American 



Amphibians and Reptiles 565. 1^4. 



, Rittenhouse, D.R. & Bauer, A.M. 2000. Laryngotracheal morphology of Afro- 



Madagascan geckos - a comparative survey. Journal of Morphology 245: 241-268. 

 Stephenson, N.G. I960. The comparative osteology of Australian geckos and its 



bearing on their morphological status. Transactions of the Royal Society of New 



Zealand 84: 341-358. 

 & Stephenson, E.M. 1956. The osteology of the New Zealand geckos and its 



bearing on their morphological status. Transactions of the Royal Society of New 



Zealand 84: 341-358. 

 Szczerbak, N.N. & Golubev, M.L. 1977. Systematica of the Palearctic geckos (genera 



Gymnodactylus, Bunopus, Alsophylax) [in Russian]. Trudy Zoologiiskogo Institute! 



Akudemiya Nauk USSR 74: 120-133. 

 & 1984. On generic assignement of the Palearctic Cyrtodactylui lizard 



species (Reptilia, Gekkonidae) [ in Russian]. Vestnik Zoologii 1984(2): 50-56. 



& 1986. Gecko Fauna of the USSR and Contiguous Regions [in Russian]. 



Naukova Dumka, Kiev. 

 Underwood, G. 1951a. Reptilian retinas. Nature 167: 183. 



195 lb. Pupil shape in certain geckos. Copeia 1951: 211-212. 



1954. On the classification and evolution of geckos. Proceedings of the Zoologi- 

 cal Society of London 124: 469^192. 

 1955. Classification of geckos. Nature 175: 1089. 



1957. On lizards of the family Pygopodidae. A contribution to the morphology 



and phylogeny of the Squamata. Journal of Morphology 100:207-268. 



1967. A Contribution to the Classification of Snakes. British Museum (Natural 



History) Publication No. 653. Trustees of the British Museum (Natural History), 

 London. 179pp. 



1968. Some suggestions concerning vertebrate visual cells. Vision Research 8: 



483-488. 



1970. The eye. pp. 1-97. In: Gans. C. & Parsons, T. (eds). Biology of the Reptilia, 



vol. X. Academic Press, London. 

 1971a. A modern appreciation of Camp's 'Classification of the lizards.' Pp. vii- 



xvii In Camp, C.L., Classification of the Lizards. Society for the Study of Amphibians 



and Reptiles, Lawrence. Kansas. 



1971b. Vertebrate comparative anatomy at the cellular level: visual cells and 



phylogeny. pp. 64-69. In: Hecht. M. (ed). Vertebrate Evolution: Mechanism and 

 Process. Report of the NATO Advanced Study Institute, Robert College, Istanbul. 

 Turkey 4-15 August, 1969. NATO. 



1977a. Simplification and degeneration in the course of evolution of squamate 



reptiles. Colloques internationaux C.N.R.S. N° 266 - Mecanismes de la 

 Rudimentation des Organes chez les Embryons de Vertebres. pp.34 1-351. 



1977b. Comments on phyletic analysis of gekkotan lizards. NATO Advanced 



Studies Institute Series (Life Sciences) 14: 53-55. 



Vanzolini, P.E. l968.Geography of the South American Gekkonidae. Arquivos de 



Zoologia 17: 85-112. 

 Vences, M„ Henkel, F.-W. & Seipp, R. 2001. Molekulare Untersuchungen zur 



Phylogenie und Taxonomie der Neukalcdonischen Geckos der Gattung Rhacodactylus 



(Reptilia: Gekkonidae). Sulamandra 37: 73-82. 

 Walls, G.L. 1942. The Vertebrate Eye. Cranhrook Institute Scientific Bulletin 19. 



Bloomfield Hills, Michigan. 

 Wellborn, V. 1933. Vergleichende ostcologische Untersuchungen an Geckoniden, 



Eublepharidenand Uroplatiden. Sitzungsberichte der Gesellschaft Naturforschender 



Freunde zu Berlin 1933: 126-199. 

 Wells, R.W. & Wellington, C.R. 1983. A synopsis of the class Reptilia in Australia. 



Australian Journal <>/ Herpetolog) 1: 73-129. 

 Werner, Y.L. 1972. Observations on eggs ol cublepharid lizards, with comments on the 



evolution of the Gekkonoidea. Zoologische Mededelingen 47: 21 1-224. pi. I. 

 1977. Ecological comments on some gekkonid lizards of the Namib Desert, South 



West Africa. Madoqua 10: 157-169. 



