124 



THE GAME BREEDER 



CONRON BROS. COMPANY 



Wholesale Dealers in GAME 



We are in the market to purchase from Preservers, 

 Game that can be legally sold in New York. If 

 you have Game to offer, communicate with our 

 main office, 



1 0th Avenue and 1 3th Street, New York 



of your arguments and the necessity for 

 adopting the plans you advocate." 



Mr. Jasper B. White, North Carolina, wrote : 

 "I like the magazine. Its articles have the 

 true ring." 



Arthur L. Johnson, Galesburg, 111., wrote: 

 ""I am interested in this 'more game' idea. 

 I know the time has come when something 

 must be done and done P. D. Q." 



Ira Marshall, Iowa, wrote: "I am Confident 

 your plan is going to work." 



Dr. Heber Bishop, Boston, Mass., wrote: 

 "I have noted what a lot of good you are 

 accomplishing, not only among sportsmen but 

 among the 'dear people,' as our friend 'John 

 D.' would call them." 



W. S. Saunders, Pecatonica, 111., wrote: "I 

 believe the wild game on our farms should 

 te a part of the farm the same as domestic 

 stock. It would then be more to the interest 

 )of the landlord or tenant to protect and care 

 ior wild game. If something is not done to 

 that effect the prairie hen and partridge will 

 become extinct. The laws to-day are exter- 

 minating instead of protecting game." 



Duncan Dunn, New Jersey, wrote : "I am 

 much interested in Mr. Huntington's articles 

 on game. I think we need just such men as 

 he to make the game boom in this country, 

 for there is nothing does away with the game 

 more than the vermin." 



Richard Clapham, Ontario, Canada, wrote: 

 ■"You have told the public out here how to 

 preserve their game correctly. ... I am 

 sick of the sight of gameless land and of 

 people who grow sentimental over past multi- 

 tudes, but do nothing to increase what little 

 there is left." 



L. J. Clark, Winona, Minn., wrote: "Right 

 you are about selling game." 



Prof. C. F. Hodge, Worcester, Mass., 

 wrote : "I am much pleased with your 

 magazine and like your point of view." 



R. S. Parks, Hollywood, Ala., wrote: "I 

 am inclined to think you are contending for 

 a great basic principle which will ultimately 

 "win on its merits." 



Wenz & Mackensen, Yardley, Pa., wrote: 

 "Under present conditions it is practically im- 

 possible to furnish any American game birds 

 and animals for stacking purposes. What can 

 be done in the matter?" 



J. Thompson Brown, Richmond, Va., wrote: 

 "Your position as to propagation vs. game 

 laws is most heartily endorsed." 



W. H. Means, M. D., Percy, Pa., wrote: 

 "I like your paper much and hope it will con- 

 tinue in the same way for 'more game'." 



A. A. Hill, New York, wrote: "That idea 

 of yours so well expressed that the farms 

 should not be made public play grounds for 

 trespassers will find a responsive chord in 

 the hearts of others besides those who are the 

 victims of this system." 



Prof. W. B. Bell, Agricultural College, 

 N. D., wrote : "I am much interested in the 

 attempt to secure united action on the part 

 of all farmers, sportsmen and others interested 

 in game protection." 



C. L. Fee, Pennsylvania, wrote: "The pop- 

 ulace is against legislation for a class, who, 

 when they pay a $1.00 license feel entitled to 

 kill a farmer's entire band of sheep and 

 calves, chickens, turkeys or anything that 

 comes their way — all for $1.00." 



Arthur Lutz, Hoboken, N. J., wrote : "You 

 are certainly right and all true sportsmen 

 will wish you success and hope that ere long 

 we mav have a chance to get a day's shoot- 

 ing without taking chances of fine or jail for 

 unintentionally breaking one of the many con- 

 fusing laws. Common sense, generally, wins 

 out and so you are bound to succeed in the 

 end." 



Dr. C. Hart Merriam, chief of the Bureau 

 of Biological Survey, U. S. Department of 

 Agriculture, wrote: "Replying to your letter 

 of the 19th inst., I would state that the words 

 'artificial propagation' in my last letter were 

 used loosely and without the significance 

 which you say is sometimes put upon this ex- 

 pression. I merely intended to refer to wild 

 game raised on private lands in contradistinc- 

 tion to wild game at large. I am heartily 

 in favor of laws permitting any one to raise 



