1866.] 



Contributions to Indian Malacology. 



155 



Two Indian species of Unio in the Musee d' Histoire Naturelle at 

 Paris have received MS. names from Valenciennes. I am unable to 

 ascertain at present if these names have been published or not. 



Corrigenda in Contributions to Indian Malacology, No. VI., in this volume : 



31, 



line 



2, 



from bottom, for 



Kimery read Kimety. 



32, 



jj 



7, 



JJ 



top, „ 



Fordoni 



„ Gordoni. 





»j 



8, 





bottom, „ 



Hattiwar 



„ Kattiawar. 



34, 





2, 



JJ 



jj jj 



inwardly 



„ conoidly. 



35, 



?> 



15, 



JJ 



top, 



subgesta 



„ subjecta. 



37, 



JJ 



12, 



JJ 



bottom, 



supply " it" after nulla. 



M 





9, 



JJ 



u 



omit the word South. 





88, 



JJ 



10, 



JJ 



top, „ 



oblong ovate, Achatina read oblong ovate 















Achatinae. 



)> 



>J 



17, 



JJ 



>j jj 



Basilens 



, Basileus. 



» 



JJ 



12, 



JJ 



bottom, „ 



Abjrceus 



„ AlyccBus. 







8, 



JJ 



jj 



Recleiz 



„ Recluz. 



39, 



lines 21 



16 & 11, from bottom, for Basilens 



, Basileus. 



j» 



line 



17, 



from bottom, for 



Wynand , 



, Wynaud. 



jj 



» 



14, 



jj 



jj >j 



Paulghat cherry 



, Paulghatcherry 





J3 



5, 



3} 



jj jj 



of that N. auris , 



, of JV. auris. 



5J 



jj 



2, 



„ 



jj jj 



base by , 



, barely. 



41, 



>> 



11, 



jj 



top, „ 



slighly , 



, slightly. 



In the previous number V. of the Contributions, an important error occurs 

 N. conula, n. s. for N. Conulus (J. A. S. B. XXXIV, 73, )865). 



In the same page, Phoung ditto, Arakan, should be Phoung Do, and three 

 pages further, p. 76, line 12, a semicolon is omitted, altering the sense. The 

 passage should read " a vertical lamina in front, and a second, slightly oblique, 

 just behind ; the first giving out" &c. instead of "just behind the first." The 

 only other erratum of importance is in page 81, line 20, where " re-entering 

 lamellar parietal" should be " re-entering parietal lamella." 



