262 UPPER CRETACEOUS-LOWER TERTIARY FORAMINIFERA 



smooth. Their form is stated to occur in the " G. uncinata zone " while G. pseudo- 

 bulloides ranges throughout the Paleocene. 



(14). Globorotalia pseudoscitida Glaessner (p. 384, pi. 2, fig. 1) is quite distinct 

 from Glaessner's form. Judging from their figure and very brief description, it may 

 well belong to Globorotalia pusilla laevigata Bolli although it appears to be much 

 larger. 



(15). Globorotalia pseudotopilensis (Subbotina) (pp. 384, 385, pi. 1, fig. 9) is very 

 different from Subbotina's form which in any case is a junior synonym of Globorotalia 

 esnaensis (Le Roy). It probably belongs to Globorotalia tribulosa Loeblich & Tappan. 



(16). Globorotalia pusilla laevigata Bolli (p. 385, pi. 3, fig. 7) belongs to Globorotalia 

 woodi El-Naggar. 



(17). Globorotalia quadrata Nakkady & Talaat (p. 385, pi. 1, fig. 10) belongs to 

 Globorotalia quadrata (White). 



(18). Globorotalia rex Martin (p. 385, pi. 2, fig. 3) belongs to Globorotalia bollii 

 El-Naggar. 



(19). Globorotalia simulatilis (Schwager) (p. 385, pi. 1, fig. 1) probably belongs to 

 Globorotalia angulata abundo earner ata Bolli. G. simulatilis was originally described 

 from younger strata and its holotype needs to be redrawn and redescribed in more 

 detail. 



(20). Globorotalia triplex (Subbotina) (p. 385, pi. i, fig. 8) differs from Subbotina's 

 holotype of Acarinina triplex which is probably Globigerina velascoensis Cushman. 



(21) Globorotalia varianta (Subbotina) (p. 386, pi. 3, fig. 9) probably belongs to 

 Globorotalia cf. convexa of the present study. Globigerina varianta Subbotina is a 

 different form which probably includes Globorotalia pseudobidloides (Plummer), 

 Globorotalia quadrata (White) and Globorotalia esnaensis (Le Roy). 



(22). Globorotalia velascoensis (Cushman) (p. 386, pi. 2, fig. 9) is probably a 

 transitional form between Globorotalia angidata abundocamerata Bolli and Globoro- 

 talia velascoensis velascoensis (Cushman). 



(23). Globorotalia wilcoxensis Cushman & Ponton (p. 386, pi. 3, fig. 14) probably 

 belongs to Globorotalia whitei Weiss. 



(24). Rugoglobigerina bidbosa Belford (p. 386, pi. 3, fig. 15) probably belongs to 

 Rugoglobigerina rugosa (Plummer). 



(25). Rugoglobigerina reicheli pustulata Bronnimann (p. 386, pi. 3, fig. 16) is a 

 doubtful form. It is described as having a smooth surface while the holotype is 

 extremely rough and coarsely rugose. 



(26). Globotruncana aegyptiaca Nakkady (pp. 386, 387, pi. 3, fig. 1) does not 

 belong to this species. It is described as single-keeled while the holo- and paratypes 

 of Nakkady, as well as the hypotypes of the present study, are entirely double- 

 keeled. Probably the form is double-keeled and, if so, it should be attributed to 

 Globotruncana gagnebini Tilev as can be seen from their figures. 



(27). Globotruncana aegyptiaca var. duwi Nakkady (p. 387, pi. 3, fig. 2) is shown 

 to have a single keel although the holo- and paratypes of Nakkady, as well as hypo- 

 types in the present study, are entirely double-keeled. 



(28). Globotruncana area (Cushman) (p. 387, pi. 2, fig. 5) belongs to Globotruncana 

 gagnebini Tilev. 



