106 FOSSIL FLORA OF EASTERN AUSTRALIA AND TASMANIA. 
were also two specimens from this locality, in which I 
recognized T'eniopteris Daintreet, M‘Coy, and Alethopteris 
y; fr 
beds with the mesozoic = Sea in Queensland and with others in 
Victoria (see further 
Rev. W. B. Clarke discusses these beds, i in the fri 
“Mesozoic or Secondary Formations.” In t tabular list 
iferous”; in both cases they are therefore represented 98 
younger tha the Newcastle beds, which is in 80 mie 
importance as, according to information received from 
Wilkinson (in letters dated 30/9/78 and 25/11/79), certam 
physical characters tend to correlate the Hawkesbury. 
sie a paleontological point of view are not widely ae 
e Wianamatta beds, with the Baodhe Man sand- 
aie in Victoria (see further on), with which h again I have 
correlated from paleontological evidence the eee 
relations have been observed. I shall mention this -_ 
when speaking of the Bacchus pan sandstones. The | 
from these beds hitherto known a ) 
a. Wianamatta beds— 
Fishes': Paleoniscus gracilis, Eg. ; Cleithrolepis ram 
latus, Eg. 
Plants: Pecopteris (Thinnfeldia) “it tay Pa 
(Fstm.); Odontopteris microph fee 
teris tenuifolia, M‘Coy; Macross 
matic, Feistm. (1878). oes 
0. Harkesbury beds— : pe | 
Fishes: Cleithrolepis gr g. (Le); 2 oi, | 
Clarkei, Eg., (ib.)  Thnnflda 2 (bee nee _ 
an aE 
teroides, Fstm.?; Sphenopteris sp-, 
sp. (Both Lib i by Professor - McCoy.) 
 / 
These fossils clearly td that both these rock ee 4 
closest relation to each o 7 , 
Pe ringg! on Sir Ph.): On some Ichthyolites from N. Ss. Wales. 
2 Teil th aso) described and illustrated by 2 eet "Fm 
Wales, the Hoch: sibiny opt 
