FOSSIL FLORA OF EASTERN AUSTRALIA AND TASMANIA. 113 
Aneimites Iguanensis, M‘Coy.—Devonian. Iguana Creek, Victoria. 
Archeopteris Howitti, M‘Coy.—Devonian. Locality the same. 
a ae Wilkinsont, Feistm. (pl. via, figs. 3, 4; vii a, 1). 
r coal measures, Smith’s Creek (Stroud), N.S. Wales. 
dsbiopeerts Sp. (pl. iv a, fig. 4).—From the same locality. 
Rhacopteris inequilatera, Cupp. (pl. ii, fig. 3; iii, iv, 1, 23 ia, h 2; 
. belongs 
species. Localities—Port Stephens, Smith’s Creek, Stroud, 
and Arowa, all N. 8. Wales. 
Rhacopteris intermedia, Feistm. (pl. ii, f. 2).—Port Stephens ; lower 
coal measures. 
Rhacopt. comp. Rémeri, Fstm. (pl. iia, f. 2).—Smith’s Creek, 
Stroud ; lower coal m 
Rhacopt. septentrionalis i aha iva, f. 5)—Smith’s Creek, 
Stroud ; lower coal m 
Thinnfeldia odontopteroides, ae Morr. sp.) (pls. xiv, fig. 5 ; xv, 
Seon ter er a, xa, and AS eek ake rris d escribed i in 
Strzelecki’s above-mentioned work, a fossil seid from the 
Jerusalem basin, as Pecopteris odontopteroides, Morr., without 
being however able to justify this determination. Prof. 
M‘Coy placed later the same species with Gleichenites. Mr. 
W. Carruthers quotes it from Queensland again as Pecopteris 
Buiiel aoreat and gave two figures. M. aed with 
considering the beds from which it came as Cad erous. 
d before, on sasdiaacisibdos 
with 5S; ‘phenopteris elongata, Carr., leaves no doubt about the 
opt en are of these Tasmanian beds. I could compare speci- 
me eensland and Tasmania, and also from the 
Wiindiiatta and Hawkesbury beds in New South Wales. The 
comparison has shown that in the ens from all the 
localities there occurs a dichotomy of the frond pretty 
that the venati 
this plant eaaaey from the genus 
ears and it ragacarteer to me that it should best be classed 
with Thinnfeldia, under which name I have described it in 
my above-mentioned oc met for the support of this view I 
quote its great resemblance to Thinnfeldia 
from the Rhetic beds of the Aries Republic.’ 
1 Paleontographica: Cassel, 1876. 
