REPORT ON FOSSIL FISHES. fal 
Fig. 6.—Flank scale, magnified six diameters. 
Fig. 7.—Scale further back, magnified six diameters. 
Fig. 8.—Sketch of bones of the head in another specimen, magnified two diameters. 
Fig. 9.—Canobius pulchellus, Traquair ; natural size (p. 51). 
Fig. 10.—Flank scale, magnified six diameters. 
Fig. 11.—Scale further back, magnified six diameters. 
Fig. 12.—Canobius pulchellus variety (p. 52). 
Fig. 13.—Flank scale from the same specimen, magnified six diameters, 
Fig. 14.—Canobius politus, Traquair ; natural size (p. 53). 
Fig. 15,—Flank scale, magnified six diameters, 
Fig, 16.—Scale further back, magnified six diameters. 
Fig. 17.—Cheirodopsis Geikiet, Traquair ; natural size (p. 56.) 
Fig. 18.—Pterygoid bone and outer surface of mandible, from another specimen, natural size. 
Fig. 19.—Flank scales, magnified three diameters. 
Fig. 20.—Scales of Ewrynotus (2) aprion, Traquair ; magnified four diameters (p. 54). 
Fig. 21.—Scales of Wardichthys cyclosoma, Traquair ; magnified four diameters. From Tweeden Burn, 
Liddesdale. 
Puate VI. 
Fig. 1.—Platysomus superbus, Traquair ; natural size (p. 58.) 
Fig. 2.—Flank scales, magnified three diameters. 
Fig. 3.—Scales towards the dorsal aspect, magnified three diameters. 
Fig. 4.—Scales of tail pedicle, magnified three diameters. 
Fig. 5.—Sculpture of rays of anterior part of dorsal fin, magnified four diameters, 
Fig. 6.—Dentition of mandible, magnified four diameters. 
VOL, XXX. PART I. L 
