MB PERCY HALL GRIMSHAW ON 



Papilio imerius. 



Papilio imerius, Godart, Enr. fth'th., ix. p. 69, n. 121 (1819). 



„ zetes, Westw., Trans. Ent. Soc, v. p. 36, t. 3, f. 1, 1* (1847). 



Godart's species is not identical, as Kirby supposed (Syn. Cat. D.L., p. 542), with pelaus, Fab., but 

 corresponds exactly with zetes, Westw. The type in the Dufresne collection has been compared with 

 British Museum specimens of zetes from St Domingo. 



Papilio leucaspis. 



Papilio leucaspis, Godart, Enc. Meth., ix. p. 55, n. 85 (1819). 

 The type of this fine species is in the Dufresne collection. 



COLEOPTERA. 



Cladognatha suturalis. 



Lucanus suturalis, Olivier, Ent., i. 1, p. 16, n. 9, t. 4, f. 12 (1789). 

 Type in Dufresne collection. 



Odontolabis camelus. 



Lucanus camelus, Olivier, Ent., i. 1, p. 22, n. 18, t. 5, f. 19 (1789). 



Odontolabis camelus, Leuthner, Trans. Zool. Soc, xi. p. 446, pi. xcvi. f. 7, 8 3 , 9 °- (1885). 

 „ gouberti, C. 0. Waterhouse, Ent. Mo. Mag., xii. p. 172 (1876). 



The type (a male) is in the Dufresne collection. The species is well described and figured by Leuthner 

 (l.r.) ; it comes from the Philippines. 



Ortctes augias. 



Scardbmu augias, Olivier, Ent, i. 3, p. 36, n. 39, t. 24, f. 212 (1789). 

 Type in Dufresne collection. 



Hexodon reticulatum. 



Hexodon reticulatum, Olivier, Ent., i. 7, p. 4, n. 1, f. 1, a-e (1789). 

 i )ne of the types of this rare species is in the Dufresne collection. 



PnOTINUS VITTATUS. 



Lampyris vittata, Olivier, F.xl., ii. 28, p. 23, n. 21, t. 3, f. 20 (1790). 

 Type in Dufresne collection. 



PHOTINUS PULGIDU8. 



Lampyris fvlgida, Olivier, A'///., ii. 28, p. 16, n. 9, t. 2, f. 9, a, b (1790). 

 „ rufa, Olivier, Ent., ii. 28, p. 28, n. 30, t. 3, f. 30 (1790). 



From an examination of the type of rufus, which is in the Dufresne collection, it appears certainly 

 identical with fidgidus, described by Olivier a few pages earlier on. Fulgidus is probably an imma- 

 ture form of rufus, the original description of which is incorrect. Olivier says, " Corpus subtus 

 pedesque rufa immaculata"; bill the type has the two lost segments of the abdomen blackish. 



