500 J. H. MAIDEN. 
fully re-examined with vastly additional material, seem to 
be true now. 
Messrs. Baker and Smith (‘Research on the Hucalypts’” 
1902) state that the oils of H. levopinea and E. Wilkin- 
soniana differ in the presence of eucalyptol in the latter, 
and in other details. I cannot trace any modification of 
this statement, and I challenge the general truth of it as 
regards the oils of say half a dozen trees reputed to be 
HK. leevopinea and EH. Wilkinsoniana respectively. 
11. EH. corrvuGATA Luehmann. See C.R., part xvi, p. 198. 
Mr. Walter Gill recently collected this Western Aus- 
tralian species near Kalgoorlie, which increases its range 
somewhat, since it was previously only known from the 
vicinity of Southern Cross. 
He also obtained juvenile foliage, hitherto unknown. 
The single specimen is very glaucous, and the rhachis. 
quadrangular. Leaves decussate, stem-clasping, the mid- 
ribs slightly decurrent, thin, equally glaucous on both sides, 
oblong or elliptical to oblong-lanceolate, witha short mucro, 
small, say 5 cm. (2 inches) by 3cm. (14 inch) long. These 
juvenile leaves remind one of those of the EH, globulus, 
Maideni, goniocalyx group. 
12. H. GOMPHOCEPHALA DC. See C.R., part xxi, p. 19. 
This species, which is mainly coastal in Western Aus- 
tralia, goes by the name ‘“‘Tuart,’’ which is, as far as I am 
aware, exclusive at the present time. Old spellings are 
““Tewart’’ and ‘** Too-art.’’ 
I have come across some interesting references, which 
show a name for the York Gum, Hucalyptus foecunda, so 
close to Tuart as to be something more than a coincidence, 
and perhaps those West Australians who study aboriginal 
names may be able to explain what is the connection 
between them. 
