Archeology and Anthropology. 377 
stations where the debris of human work united the two ages 
(paleolithic and neolithic), and testify the passage from one to the 
other.” i 
nothing to prove this.” 
Of the neolithic age the author says, “‘ The reindeer was disap- 
pearing from the country (southern France).” He should have 
said, “ had already disappeared.” 
gain, “some of the dolmens of France are known under the 
name of menhirs.” He should have said, “some of the megaliths,” 
e 
: “ The men of the neolithic age immolated without doubt human 
ae to their gods,” ete. M. Cartailhac asks “ How do we know 
is? 
_ Again, “the similitude of the dolmens of India and Europe, 
like those of Europe and America,” ete. M. Cartailhac says the 
last word should be Africa, for we do not know of true dolmens in 
America. 
And, “it is nearly certain that the construction of dolmens was 
perpetuated in England and in France until near the eighth cen- 
tury of our era.” M. Cartailhac says “ this is a complete error.” 
til y the country at large. He has been for many years the 
lecturer on this science before the School of Anthropology in Paris. 
He was the founder of the journal Materiaux pour L’ Histoire Prim- 
ive et Naturelle De L’ Homme, now conducted by Cartailhac and 
Chantre. In 1883 he established the journal Z Homme, which he 
has carried on with credit to himself and profit to his readers. He 
announces, with the close of the last year, the cessation of its publi- 
cation. His assistants and coadjutors rank amongst the highest in 
ate 
logic, Thulié; Comparative Anatomy, Georges Hervé; Archeology 
