ANTHROPOLOGICAL RESULTS. 



415 



FACE-MEASURES 

 [the absol. measures in mm.' 



Abs. ] Rel. 

 value 



ÏORRICELLI 



PAPUANS 



Abs. | Rel 



value 



JAKUMUL 



Abs. | Rel. 

 value 



Abs. | Rel. 

 value 



LE1TERE 



PAPUANS 



Abs. | Rel. 



value 



BONGKO 



PAPUANS 



Abs. | Rel. 



value 



Stand, height .... 

 Length of head . 

 Breadth of head . 

 Sm. breadth of forehead 

 Bizygom. width . . . 

 Bigon. width .... 

 Ind. fronto-parietalis 

 Ind. cran.-facialis transv. 

 Ind. jugo-mandibularis 

 Morph. height of face . 

 Ind. facialis .... 

 Length of nose . 

 Breadth of nose . 

 Ind. nasalis .... 



1547 



i; 



19 



15 



IS6.S 



12.07 



183-5 



12.10 



190.7 



145-7 



9.42 



142.5 



9-36 



141 2 



102.5 



6.63 



98.8 



6.53 



101. 7 



137-5 



8.S9 



133 9 



8.82 



137-6 



102.5 



6.63 



99.2 



6-53 



102.4 



70.4 



— 



69.2 



— 



7i-7 



94-95 



— 



93-5 



— 



97.8 



74-5 



— 



74.2 



— 



74 — 



112. — 



7.24 



10S.7 



7.14 



1 12.2 



81.6 



— 



S1.1 



— 



80. S 



48.- 



3.10 



50.9 



3-35 



50.6 



44-— 



2.84 



44-3 



2.91 



44-— 



92-5 



— 



S7.4 



— 



S6.8 



582 



12.06 



8.92 



6.41 

 8.68 

 6.47 



1600 



15 



186.5 



il. 65 



1S7.1 



H3-7 



8.96 



146. — 



99.6 



6.21 



104. — 



138.- 



S.61 



139.2 



— 



— 



105. 1 



6S.7 



— 



70.7 



95-7 



— 



94 9 



— 



— 



74-4 



114 1 



7.10 



m. 9 



S2.2 



— 



79.8 



52.— 



3-25 



5'. 1 



45-4 



2. 84 



42.7 



87.2 



— 



83.2 



1600 



7.05 



323 



2.70 



189 

 136 



1 

 2 



102 



1 



135 



5 



I02 



6 



75 



— 



100 



— 



75 



S 



114 



7 



84 



8 



53 



4 



43 



6 



82 



— 



8-5 

 6.38 

 8.47 

 6.41 



3-34 

 2.73 



To facilitate comparison of thèse figures with eachother, the relative values are added. 

 In considering the table carefully, one will find out that the three breadth-measurements of 

 the face of Jakumul, Arup and Bongko-Papuans are markedly smaller than those of the Timo- 

 rini; that those of the Toricelli-men are smaller too, but in a limited degree, and that those 

 of the Leitere-men are showing only a little différence. The relative head-breadth of the 

 Torricelli was the same as that of the Timorini ; consequently the Index fronto-parietalis and 

 the Index cran.-facialis must be smaller, as is really the case. Of Jakumul and Bongko- 

 men the head-breadth is comparatively smaller than that of the face, so that the Ind. fronto- 

 pariet. and the Ind. cran.-facialis are surpassing those of the Timorini. The Leitere-Papuans 

 hâve nearly the same index-figures as the Timorini. 



In ail groups the height of the face proves to be shorter than in the Timorini, but it 

 is shortest of ail among the Leitere-men. And as the bizyg. breadth of the latter was only 

 a little smaller than that of the Timorini, they must show a still more euryprosopic face, 

 while the other tribes, according to their smaller face-breadth, hâve a facial index approaching 

 closely that of the Timorini. The Bongko-men form an exception; they are mesoprosopic. 



Finally we state that the noses of ail the groups are longer than those of the Timorini. 

 Yet I tried to measure from the Sutura nasofrontalis and it may be stated that my Bongko- 

 men hâve indeed a nose-length not inferior to that of the other mentioned tribes. Nevertheless 

 I will not deny that there may exist mistakes in my measurements. However, it is most 

 remarkable to state the comparative narrowness of the Leitere-nose. This must even be called 

 mesorrhine and is in this respect only surpassed by the longer Bongko-nose. 



Hère also it is difficult to draw conclusions. It is really a muddle. In the preceding 

 chapter we pointed out that the Bongko-face seemed to escape the narrowness of the skull. 

 (Ind. cran.-facialis 100!) and this gives ground to the idea that the narrowness of the face 

 (Ind. fac. 84,8) might be secondary. It is true that the dolichocephalic Jakumul with their 

 Ind. fronto-pariet. 71,7 and Ind. cran.-facialis 97,8 do not object to this supposition, though 

 they support it only feebly; but for the Arup it does not go, (Ind. fronto-pariet. 6S~7) and 



