516 
tW 
is fo} 
"SL 
‘suoTydiIosep 94} WOIJ UAVIP ‘souUITJNO ‘MATA Yyouq ‘4yuadtas-vag 
S55 
= 
——— 
SSS 
‘suotjdtiosop oY} Wod; WAvIpP “MOTA apts ‘yuedtes-Beg 
CONCLUSIONS. 
males would, in gener- 
al, prove to surpass 
the females twice in 
size and four or six 
times in weight. In 
my opinion large in- 
dividuals are, therefore, 
males, and must have 
a mane, OF atone 
time have had one. 
The probability exists 
that they lose the great- 
er part of their mane 
at a certain age, or 
that they were moul- 
ting when they were 
seen; which would ac- 
count for the fact that 
in some large indivi- 
duals no mane was 
observed. 
I have ventured to 
draw the outlines of 
the animal from the 
descriptions. Fig. 72 
represents it as seen 
from aside, with the 
divisions of the colours, 
and fig. 73 as seen 
on the back with the 
whiskers and the ex- 
tension of the mane 
in the males. 
