Vol. 538.] OF FOSSIL PLANTS FROM NEW SOUTH WALES. 13 
1878. Feistmantel (78) p. 88. 
1883. Tenison-Woods (83) p. 90. 
1890. Feistmantel (90) p. 92. 
The figured specimen is an imperfect fragment of a frond or pinna 
in association with Glossopteris Browniana. The specimen measures 
2 inches, and only one half is well preserved. A perfect pinna, or 
secondary pinna, measures 13 inches, and is pinnatifid, with entire 
and ovate lobes. 
6. SPHENOPTERIS LOBIFOLIA, Morris. 
Woodwardian Mus. Camb., Foreign Plant Coll. No. 22. 
Localit y—Mulubimba. 
Sphenopteris lobifolia. 
1845. Morris (45) p. 246 & pl. vii, figs. 3 & 3a. 
1847. McCoy (47) p. 149. 
1849. Dana (49) p. 715 & pl. xii, fig. 12. 
1850. Unger (50) p. 128. 
1878. Feistmantel (78) p. 87. 
1883. Tenison-Woods (83) p. 88. 
1890. Feistmantel (90) p. 93. 
The specimen of this plant in the collection is a small fragment 
about 2 inches long, also in association with Glossopteris Browniana. 
It consists of a pinna with alate rhachis, and alternate, linear, 
pinnatifid pinnules, with very acute, equal, approximate and rounded 
lobes. The median nerve gives off dichotomizing secondary nerves | 
to each lobe. Dr. Szajnocha * has identified certain Argentine plants 
as belonging to this species, and has referred Morris’s plant to Brong- 
niart’s Pecopteris Schoenleiniana”~ from the Keuper of Wiirtzbure. 
IT am, however, unable to agree with this latter identification. 
III. Ganeamopreris, McCoy, 1861. 
Trans. Roy. Soc. Vict. vol. v (1860) p. 107 note. 
GANGAMOPTERIS ANGUSTIFOLIA, McCoy. 
Type—Woodwardian Mus. Camb., Foreign Plant Coll. No. 18 (also No. 70). 
Localities.—Guntawang, and Wilbertee, Mudgee. 
Gangamopteris angustifolia. 
1875. McCoy (74-78) dec. 1, p. 11 & pl. xii, fig. 1. 
1876. Feistmantel, Rec. Geol. Surv. Ind. vol. ix, p. 120, 
1878. Feistmantel (78) p. 102. 
1883. Tenison- Woods (88) p. 127. 
1890. Feistmantel (90) p. 130. 
Cyclopteris angustifolia. 
1847. McCoy (47) p. 148 & pl. ix, figs. 3 & 3a. 
McCoy’s type-specimen consists of five or six fragments, the largest 
of which, the figured type (pl. ix, fig. 3), is an imperfectly preserved 
frond, 32 inches in length, and slightly more than 2inch wide. The 
frond is sublinear, and has a broad, shallow, median longitudinal 
groove. There isnomidrib. ‘The lateral nerves arise by dichotomy 
from a subparallel group of central nerves, and at a very acute 
angle; they diverge gradually towards the margin of the frond, 
1 Szajnocha (88) p, 225. 
* Brongniart (28)? p. 364 & pl. exxvi, fig. 6. 
