but which (as already stated under t. CL.) is very different from 
the plant so named by Roth; and has, indeed, more in common 
with C. ¢ortuosa, Dillw. I regret that I have been unable re- 
cently to compare my specimens with those found by Carmichael, | 
and I have therefore relied for the ¢ype of this species on the spe- 
cimens published in Mrs. Wyatt’s ‘ Algze Danmonienses,’ as that 
work is in the hands of many persons. It is possible that in 
some collections more than one plant may be confounded under 
the name /inum, Br. F., but I trust the figure now given will 
sufficiently define what I understand by that exploded species. 
Not having been able to identify our British specimens with any 
continental species, I have been forced to bestow a new name — 
on them. 
Fig. 1. Conrerva LitoRea :—the natural size. 2. Portion of two filaments : 
—magnified. 
