MULTIPLE NEUROMATA OF THE CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM. 193 
Kuntz, ‘“‘A Contribution to the Histogenesis of the Sympathetic Nervous System,” Anat, Record, vol. iii., 
1909, p. 458. 
Lenuossek, ‘Zur Frage der Entwickelung der periph. Nervenfasern,” Anat. Anzeiger, Bd. xxviii., 1906, 
p. 287. 
Lewis, ‘Experimental Evidence in Support of the Theory of the Outgrowth of the Axis-Cylinder,” Amer. 
Journ. of Anat., vol. vi., 1906-7. 
*La Prena, ‘Su la genesi ed i rapporti reciproci degli elementi nervosi nel medullo-spinale di pollo,” Annali 
di Nevrologia, 1904, f. 6; Forp Roprrtson, Rev. Newrol. and Psychiat., vol. ii., 1905, p. 608. 
ScnarEr, “Die friihesten Differenzierungsvorgange im Centralnervensystem,” Archiv fiir Hntwickelung- 
mech., Bd. v., 1897, p. 81. 
Scuuurze, (1) ‘Ueber die Entwickelung des peripheren Nervensystems,” Anat. Anzetger, Erg. Heft, 1904, 
pao: 
(2) “Beitraége zur Histogenese des Nervensystems,” Archiv fiir Mikr. Anat., Bd. lxvi., 1905, 
p. 41. 
(3) “ Zur Histogenese der peripheren Nerven,” Anat. Anzeiger, Erg. Heft, 1906, p. 179. 
Sepewick, ‘On the Inadequacy of the Cellular Theory of Development and on the Early Development of 
Nerves,” Quart. Journ. of Microsc. Sc., vol. xxxvui., 1895, p. 87. 
II.—GEnEsSIS IN REGENERATION. 
Auznerer, “Uber die Degeneration u. Regeneration an der peripheren Nervenfaser,” Neurol. Centralbl., 
Pdeexxix,, 1910; p. (15. 
BaLiance and Stewart, The Healing of Nerves, London, 1901. 
Barrurtu, ‘‘ Die Regeneration peripherer Nerven,” Anat. Anzeiger, Erg. Heft, Bd. xxvii., 1905, p. 160. 
*Besta, “Sopra la degenerazione e regenerazione delle fibre nervose periferiche,” Riv. Sperim. di Frenatria, 
t. xxxii., 1906, p. 99; Neurol. Centralbl., Bd. xxv., 1906, p. 813. 
Brrue, ‘‘ Neue Versuche iiber die Regeneration der Nervenfasern,” Archiv fiir die Phystol., Bd. exvi., 1907, 
p. 385. 
*Brerschowsky, (1) “Uber der Bau der Spinalganglion unter normalen und pathol. Verhiiltnissen, Ein 
Beitrag zur Kenntniss der Regenerationvorgiinge an Ganglionzellen und Nerven,” Journ. f. Psychol. wu. 
Neurol., Bd. xi., 1908, p. 188. 
= (2) “Uber Regenerationserscheinungen an centralen Nervenfasern,” ibid., Bd. xiv., 1909, 
p. 131. 
Casat, (1) “Les métamorphoses précoces des neurofibrilles dans la régénération et la dégénération des nerfs, 
Travaux du Laboratoire de Recherches Biologiques, Madrid, t. v., 1907, p. 47. 
(2) ‘Nouvelles observations sur l’évolution des Neuroblastes,” cbzd., t. v., 1907, p. 169. 
(3) “Die Histogenetischen Beweise der Neuronentheorie von His und Forel,” Anat. Anzezger, 
Poeexxx,, 1907, p. 113: 
Durck, “ Untersuchungen iiber die path. Anat. der Beri-beri,” Beztr. z. path. Anat. u. z, allg. Path., Suppl., 
Bad. viii., 1908, p. 1. 
Fickuer, (1) ‘‘Studien zur Path. und path. Anat. des Riickenmarkcompression bei Wirbelcaries,” Deut. 
Zeit. fiir Nervenheilk., Bd. xvi., 1900, p. 1. 
(2) ‘ Recherches expérimentelles sur l’anatomie de la Dégénération traumatique et la Régénération 
de la moelle épiniére,” ¢bid., Bd. xxix., 1905, p. 1. 
Fuemine, ‘The Peripheral Theory of Nerve Regeneration, with special reference to Peripheral Neuritis,” 
The Scottish Med. and Surg. Journal, vol. xi., 1902, p. 193. 
Gateorti and Levi, “Ueber die Neubildung der nervésen Elemente in dem wiederzeugten muskelgewebe,” 
Beitr. z. path. Anat. u. z. allg. Path., Bd. xvii., 1895, p. 369. 
Heap and Ham, ‘‘The Process of Regeneration in an Afferent Nerve,” Journ. of Physiol., vol. xxxii., 
1904-5, p. 9 (Proc.). 
Heap, Rivers, and Snerren, “The Afferent Nervous System from a New Aspect,” Brain, 1905, vol. xxviii., 
p- 99. 
TRANS. ROY. SOC. EDIN., VOL. XLVIII. PART ITI. (NO. 27). Le 
” 
