888 JURASSIC PLANTS FROM CROMARTY AND SUTHERLAND, SCOTLAND. 
Jerrrey, E. C. (05), ‘The Comparative Anatomy and Englogene of the Coniferales. Part II.: The Abietinez,” 
Mem. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist., vol. vi. 
—— (07), ‘‘ Araucariopitys, a New Genes of Araucarians,” Bot. Gaz., vol. iy, p. 435. 
—— (10), “On the Affinities of the Genus Yezonia,” Ann. Bot., vol. xxiv. p. 767. 
—— (11), “The Affinities of Getnitzia gracillima,” Bot. Gaz., vol. 1. p. 21. 
Lianigr, O. (07), ‘‘ Végétaux fossiles de Normandie: iv. Bois divers (1" sér.),” Mém. Soc. Linn. Norm., 
tome xxii. 
Miter, H. (57), The Testimony of the Rocks, Edinburgh. 
Naruorst, A. G. (97), “Die mesozoischen Flora nao Ae Svensh. Vetenskapsakad. Hand., Bad. XX 
No. 1. 
—— (08), ‘‘ Palaobotanische Mitteilungen, vii.,” dbid., Bd. xliii., No. 8, 
Pinger, R. (03), “Taxacee.” Hu Das Pflanzenreich, A. Engler, "Heft 18 (iv. 5). 
Poroni#, H. (99), Lehrbuch der Pflanzenpalaeontologie, Berlin. 
Sarorta, Le Comre be (738), ‘‘ Plantes Jurassiques,” tome i., Pal. Prang., 2° sér. 
ScuEnK, A. (67), Die fossile Flora der Grenzschichten der Keuper und Lias Prankens., Wiesbaden. 
——— (87), “ Fossile Pflanzen aus der Albourskette,” Biblioth. Bot., Heft 6. 
Scurmprer, W. P., and A. Mouanor (44), Monographie des Plantes fossiles du Gres Bigarré de la chaine des 
Vosges, Leipzig. 
Sewarp, A. C., (96), ‘‘ A New Species of Conifer, Pinites Ruffordi, from the English Wealden Formation,” 
Journ. Linn, Soc., vol. xxxii. p. 417. 
—— (04) “The Jurassic Flora.” II. Catalogue of the Mesozoic Plants in the Dept. of Geology, Brit. Mus., fp 4 
London. 
—— (11), “ The Jurassic Flora of Sutherland,” Trans, Roy. Soc. Hdin., vol. xlvii. Pt. iv., No. 23, p. 643. 
(12), “A Petrified Wil/tamsonia from Scotland,” Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, vol. cciii. p. 101. 
Srewarp, A. C., and S. Forp (06), “ The Araucariex, Recent and Extinct,” Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., vol. exeviil. 
p. 305, 
Sropss, M. C, (11), “A Reply to Professor Jeffrey's Article on Yezonia and Cuisine ” Ann. Bot., vol. 
xxv. p. 269. 
Srovgs, M. C., and K. Fusu, (10), ‘Studies on the Structure and Affinities of Cretaceous Plants,” Phil. 
Rens Roy. Soc., vol. cci, p. 1. 
Veenovsky, J. (85), Die ‘mospenien der bohimischen K Path eran Prag. 
EXPLANATION OF PLATES. 
Puate I. 
Fig. 1. Thinnfeldia scotica sp. nov. Nat. size. (Professor NarHorst’s collection, Stockholm.) 
Figs. 2-4. Brachyphyllum eathiense sp. nov. Sections of leaves. #, transfusion tracheides ; p, palisade 
cells. Fig. 2, x50; fig. 3, x 15; fig. 4, x 35. 
Fig. 5. Vaxites Jeffreys Sew. Section of leaf, x 100. 
Figs. 6-8. Masculostrobus Woodwardi sp. nov. Fig. 6, nat. size; fig. 7, x4; fig. 8, x36. a (2), 
sporogenous cells. 
Figs. 9-12. Conites Juddi sp. nov. forma y. For explanation see text, pp. 876-878. Fig. 9, x14; 
fig. 10, x 4; fig. 11, x10; fig. 12, x 14. 
Fig. 13. Strobilites Milleri sp. nov. Nat. size. 
Puate II. 
Figs. 14-16. Conites Juddi sp. nov. forma y. Fig. 14, x7; fig, 15, x 25; fig. 16, x 30. 
Figs. 17-21. Conites Juddi sp. nov. forma 6. Figs. 17, 18, 20, 21 enlarged photographs of cone- 
scales B, ©, D, A, fig. 19. Fig. 19, x 12; figs. 17, 18, 21, x5; fig. 20, x 6. 
Figs. 22--25. Cedroxylon Hornet sp. nov. Figs, 22-24, x 250; fig. 25, x 40. 
