19 Haakon Schetelig. | [No. 8 
pr) 
brooeh bear evident marks of its Teutonic origin; it must be ranged 
among the similar Teutonic brooches figured above. 
It is clear that such imitations of the Roman brooches have 
little to do with the origin of the type especially signified — in 
England and Scandinavia — as the cruciform brooches. The bronehes 
figs. 7—10 and others of the same family, though not completely 
without descendants among the later Scandinavian forms, are well 
distinguished from the cruciform brooches in the meaning I have 
Fig. 8. Bio 9 
given to this signifacation. The question being of some interest, I 
will in åa few words mention some brooches which are, I think, 
representing the later development of the half Roman forms, in 
spite of my studies upon this point not being quite complete. I think 
it is necessary to explain in that way the specimens figs. 11 and 12;*) 
1) Fig. 11: Vestre Vestrum, Hedrum pgd. Larvik. OC. 12377. Ab. 1888, 
p. 114. — Fig. 19: Bjerke, Hedrum pgd. Larvik. OC. 2496. RyeH fig. 245. 
—— 
3 
